• Skelectus@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s pretty impressive they managed to do a soft KSP-style landing without an engine nozzle.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, that’s the bigger deal. They lost an engine and still managed a soft landing. They just landed upside down – but the solar cells might still work.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And for the record, the lander was supposed to land on its side. It’s designed to do a quarter turn just before it touches the ground, but because of a slope, it rolled a little bit further than they wanted.

        It was so close to perfect!

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why does a country with no ballistic missile program go for this sort of feat? Japan really has the tech base and uranium reprocessing ability to rocket into having ICBMs in no time.

    • PostingInPublic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Japan got struck twice with thermonuclear bombs in world war 2, in 2 cities named Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Look it up. They are very much against nuclear arms in general since then.