• NeilBru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    44 minutes ago

    Or maybe the DNC refuses to speak to, let alone execute an agenda regarding the needs of the working class, election after election. Of course they’d be trounced after effectively revealing themselves as controlled opposition.

    My forlorn hope is a massive repudiation of the Democratic establishment in the next round of primaries.

    Armed revolution in the face of predator drones with hellfires and 5th generation multi-role fighter aircraft is a fools errand for suicidal rubes.

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I kinda get what you mean, am I’m really weirded out by how obsessed the US is with ethnic groups, like “black vote”, “white vote” etc, because most countries don’t focus on race like that.

    But data wise, Trump barely increased his vote share in white men over last election, but significantly increased in black men, so I think that’s why some data analysts are pointing it out as an interesting shift in the electorate. However to suggest it’s any ethnic group’s “fault” someone won is just stupid. And if you’re gonna do that, try gen-X white men living in the countryside.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      That’s because most countries are far more ethnically homogenous than the US. The ones that aren’t show similar patterns. Look at India for example. Or Israel.

      • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        This is, of course, Ameri-centric horseshit. American voting is reported on as white, black, Latino and not-statisitcally-significant. Meanwhile they’ll call other countries “ethnically homogenous” mostly because they don’t know anything about any other countries or literally thousands of years of finding any reason to hate each other. Motherfucker I don’t care if we’re genetically identical I’ll be dead and buried before I vote for a fucking Walloon/Protestant/Catholic/Silesian/Scouser/Galician/Lombard/Frisian (delete as appropriate). They haven’t at any point all been thrown into a cage, deprived of their heritage and told “nah you’re just black/mexican now”. And it ignores that yes, global migration is global. Every colonial state has left people behind in its former colonies, and found themselves with former subjects as citizens too.

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      As an outsider, my guess is to construct and and cultivate the idea that minorities vote in a block. I mean, no one literally needs to be told that non white people all vote for the same person or anything. However, it only has to work just enough to make just enough white people vote down racial lines.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m all for not scapegoating any minority, since what’s notable about the Black vote is roughly the same as for Latin American, younger demographics, and so on: it isn’t that they are “to blame,” it’s that the support increased over 2016 or 2020.

    So while it’s a good reminder not to scapegoat, we definitely still need to talk and think about how different demographics (who will absolutely lose rights and opportunities under Trump) looked at Trump and decided to say, “more, please,” if we’re ever going to get out of this mess.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    The moderate wing feels entitled to those votes.

    And for whatever reason they keep doubling down on refusing to do voter outreach and listening to what Dem voters want. Current leadership will never back away from the strategy of:

    What are ya gonna do, vote R?

    Because it’s obviously not working. As long as we allow the DNC to prioritize rewarding donor bundlers with leadership positions, it’ll never change.

    The only metric is bringing money in, so whoever pays the most gets to determine the party platform.

    Which wouldn’t suck so much if the DNC was the furthest right option. When that’s how the furtherest left option acts, turnout will always be abysmal and even when we “win” we still lose and billionaires always win.

        • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          That doesn’t mean we can win without donors. Republicans had foreign bots and billionaires buying votes.

              • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                35 minutes ago

                There isn’t a question in your previous comment.

                And apparently you haven’t heard the one.

                You don’t wrestle a pig in mud because it gets mud all over you and the pig likes it.

                It will only drive up donorship to the Republicans and foster more lenient bribery donation policy from the Democrats going forward.

                The Democrats need to actually submit themselves to overhauling campaign funding if they want to make any headway. But they want that money. They want it more than they want any of their alleged policy goals.

                • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  32 minutes ago

                  Because of citizens united, money decides election wins. So how do we win without donors?

                  This was the question that you are avoiding.

                  To overhaul campaign funding they need to win. For that to happen they need donors.

                  Also, just because a saying exists doesn’t make it right.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Instead the base should focus their anger on the democratic party itself. Give us something to fight for or keep losing

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Haven’t had a real primary since 2008. WTF is this anti democratic “superdelegate” bullshit?

      The party leadership has been captured by big money donors.

  • yesman@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Every election cycle, the Democrats and media start to fret about the black vote. Will black women turn out? Will black men vote correctly? And this cycle culminated in the Obamas going on a “pull your pants up and vote” tour to boost turnout.

    Now I’m not black, but I recognize double standards and condescension. I wouldn’t want to be treated that way.

    After the election, Latinos have been targeted by progressive rage and lashing out. I’ve seen people that I used to respect say that they deserve to be deported because of their vote.