• sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The thing is, I don’t need to be online.

    I bet most people are playing single player.

    Apart from the people doing multiplayer 10-20%?) everyone else could just be offline.

    This is for them.

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s even weirder because I’d expect even those playing with friends to be doing so in their locally hosted servers with at most 4 friends I think? The people playing on the official servers are such a minority that I can’t fathom this cost being worth it.

  • 50gp@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    thats a fuckton of server space, i didnt think playing on random official servers with no admins or good anti cheats would be that popular

      • LazerVHSion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Running a passworded Palworld server on Linux. Have about 7-10 active players on it and the server instance balloons up to ~33GB of RAM usage in less than 12 hours of uptime.

        Supposedly disabling some features (like base raids) reduces resource utilization, but was curious what stock settings would do.

        When it was restricted to 10GB on a container it would just crash every couple of hours, running out of resources.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well 19m players x $29 is $551,000,000 banked so far.

    They could pocket a few dozen million and still run the servers for around 85 years.