The problem with generalizations is that you forget that people you’ve never met are still people. Most just want to raise their families and enjoy life
The problem with generalizations is that you forget that people you’ve never met are still people. Most just want to raise their families and enjoy life
I disagree with the conclusion. This makes a better case for separation of power so the person in charge can’t look up the opposition
I don’t think you understand what decentralized means
I don’t think you can draw a direct line from the statistics to economic policy. It may be more true that the voters for the Republican party are less educated and more rural in those counties
You say they spend it on TVs, cars, clothes, iPhones, whatever, like it’s a bad thing. A good tv is only a few hundred so 3% of your 10,000. If someone is trying to improve their employment they will need new clothes, reliable transportation, and reliable communication. 10,000 for a car is not a good car, but enough to get to work on time. I agree that lowering the cost of essentials is good, but incredibly hard in a free market. It’s easier to raise wages through legislation
The trick is to draw people from buying furniture from the big box store to their store and still more to the growing population that is now price conscious.