• KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    The amount of people thinking they are getting ripped off by steam now is astounding.

    They are the reason this step is incredibly necessary.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean I’ve always had an issue that digital goods could always be revoked/taken back. That’s why I didn’t buy things on steam until it became basically the only way (as consoles have less physical media). This is just a great reminder for the public that we’re consistently loosing control over our digital lives.

      I’ve been an advocate for forcing companies to change the wording for digital goofs to “lease” rather than “buy”. Cause at the end of the day, no one owns their steam library.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, we are… Gabe became a billionaire that owns a yacht collection, his money came from somewhere, there’s no reason to defend any billionaires or their companies unless you are a billionaire yourself.

      • Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Gabe heads a company which is successful because it respects its employees, customers, and suppliers instead of constantly trying to marginalize and abuse them. They are not perfect by any means, but they do fit into the definition of ethical capitalism, which should not be understated. They don’t employ anticompetitive tactics like bribing/coercing developers into exclusivity contracts. They don’t operate with a bunch of 1099 contractors so they can avoid providing benefits. Etc.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          And they could do all of these good things while charging less than 30% and Gabe would be the only one feeling a negative impact on his finances.

          As for contractors, they do hire them, court documents came out and their profits per actually employees are way higher than most companies, why? Contractors aren’t employees.