Short Summary

  1. Tucker Carlson interviews Russian President Vladimir Putin, emphasizing journalists’ duty to inform about the Ukraine war and its global impact.
  2. Some praise Carlson for the interview, advocating that everyone has the right to be heard.
  3. CNN’s Christiane Amanpour counters Carlson’s claims, stating journalists have long attempted to interview Putin.
  4. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov denies Carlson’s claim of exclusive access to Putin.
  5. Carlson alleges the Biden Administration hacked his and his company’s phones to leak messages and derail the interview.
  6. The video concludes with discussions on the importance of tough questioning in interviews and potential EU sanctions against Carlson.
  7. The speaker discusses COVID, Israel-Palestine, and journalism, highlighting issues like restricted interviews with Putin and pressure on TV shows in Ukraine.
  8. They mention the suppression of pro-Palestinian speech in Europe, particularly Germany, and its impact on journalists.
  9. The concept of access journalism is explored, where journalists may conduct lighter interviews to secure more substantial ones later.
  10. The speaker reflects on their own interview with Dr. Fauci, the trade-offs involved, and invites viewer engagement for upcoming content.
  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s horribad click bait. The EU already announced they aren’t going to sanction him just for doing the interview.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      EU does not have the 1st amendment and they blocked pro-palestine protests, so it is good to hear that sanctions will not happen.

      I posted a summary of video so as to let you know what the video is about.

      Thanks for the info!

  • criitz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Remember when Fox News successfully argued in court that no one could seriously take Carlson’s comments as facts, so he couldn’t be sued for lying? This man is not a journalist.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      No bueno, seems too authoritarian to my liking. Censorship is not good for the people.

      Jailing people for talking to other people, even if they are powerful, should not be illegal.

      I also think whistle blowers should not be jailed, they should be awarded, especially the journalists!

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Breathe, dude. Where does it say “censor”? Nowhere.

        And free speech isn’t freedom of consequences.

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It also only applies to a government’s influence over its own citizens. Carlson is not a citizen of the EU.

        • Limonene@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Freedom of Speech does mean freedom from consequences, at least from any government that recognizes that freedom of speech. The phrase, “Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences” refers to the ability of private entities to take negative actions against speakers engaging in free speech, simply because those negative actions were within the private entities’ rights all along. For example, the ability of any Lemmy instance to ban anyone they want.

          Regardless, speech that is actively harmful, is false, or meets certain other circumstances (depending on which government you’re looking at) may not be recognized as covered free speech. Tucker Carlson is probably about to do a bunch of speech that is not covered by freedom of speech, which is why the expected sanctions will be justified.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Censorship is not good for the people.

        Oh yes, totally agree. Before this we never heard Putin’s perspective. It’s not like he has a media empire to get his message out.

        This isn’t about censorship. This is about lending credence to Putin’s actions.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          And profiting from a foreign power that has sanctions against it in the EU (and US btw, I wish our state department could cancel his passport).

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is not just “talking”, it’s a propaganda business deal with a sanctioned foreign adversary and needs to be treated as such. And Carlson is not a journalist. Literally. He argued that in court.

      • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You are talking to people from burguerstates. If they disagree with you, you should be silenced. Thats democracy to them

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Russia has multiple English language media companies and could release their own Putin stuff. Carlson is going to use his billion dollar trust fund to pay for slick editing, a writing team to make leading questions, and generally make Putin approachable. There is no reason for this except to stop US support against Russia. This is propaganda made and paid for by Tucker Carlson.

    Tucker is an aspiring traitor who needs to be investigated.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I hope Ukraine drones his ass.

    Propagandists are fair game in war, just ask Lord HawHaw.

    Also, if you’re even remotely comparing Dr. Fauci to Putin, I cannot take anything you say seriously.