Greetings all!
There are a few YouTube channels I watch on a regular basis that I’d put in the science/math bin. Here are a few examples:
NileRed Standup Maths Steve Mould AlphaPhoenix
I was wondering if anyone here had any recommendations for other science/math channels to follow or a resource that aggregates good channels. As a lay person, as in no college level education on these topics, I’m not sure I have the qualifications to determine if a channel is highly accurate or not. I think I’ve done a good job finding channels that are accurate but wanted to check in with folks that may be able to better determine that.
I’m particularly interested in astronomy, cosmology, and evolution.
You must log in or register to comment.
Clint’s Reptiles: He does great videos covering phylogeny as well as pet scores for individual species.
Professor Dave Explains: A huge variety of content explaining science, my favorites so far are on phylogeny.
Mothlight Media: Videos on evolution of modern and extinct species. One of my favorites!!
Others mentioned PBS Eons, you would most definitely like it.
Damn Everyone here is nerd too. I am not alone.
Lot of stuff already listed so here are some more niche channels if you are interested:
Meteorology: WeatherWest
Geography & climate: Casual Earth
Nutrition: No Lab Coat Required
Cool Worlds and Dr Becky are both pretty good for astronomy and general space stuff.
I left YouTube a long time ago for a couple reasons. But besides the content creators you mentioned, I also used to follow:
- ElectroBOOM: Mehdi talks about electrical engineer in a practical, humorous way. He has a segment called “Rectifiy” where he debunks internet videos, particularly these fake “Free energy” internet videos.
- The Action Lab: didactic experimentations with physics.
- Computerphille: interviews with teachers and specialist from several scientific and engineering fields, especially IT-related fields.
- 3Blue1Brown (IIRC): mathematician.
- Tom Scott, back when he produced videos: I guess everyone knows about him.
- Technology Connections: often focuses on household appliances (refrigerators, air conditioners, dishwashers, lamps, etc) but also explains applied scientific knowledge and also photography.
If I remember other content creators, I’ll update my comment. It has been a long time since I abandoned YouTube.
Let’s talk about latent heat and the refrigeration cycle!!
3blue1brown is phenomenal. It taught me how to understand a bunch of things better than studying them academically did.
“Journey to the Microcosmos” is wonderful.
ZeFrank has quite a lot of accurate biology if you want a humor channel in there.
PBS Eons is great.
I haven’t checked them out, but I feel like things like Nebula or CuriosityStream may be becoming better sources for this stuff than YouTube is. YouTube seems like it is becoming a chess, and I see no real reversal of that in the cards any time soon.
I’ll second 3blue1brown.
Scott Manley is, of course, mainly interested in rockets, but does cover sciencey things too (I believe he’s a former professional astronomer).
I like Cleo Abram’s “optimistic science” shorts.
Love Scott Manley!
After looking up Cleo Abram I remembered I watched a video where she was hanging out with a paleontologist and that I enjoyed how geeked out she was to find some fossils :) I’ll check out those shorts! Shorts are nice with the kids too. They’re still a bit younger but are curious so that may be the perfect length.
Awesome, thanks for the recommendations!
I’ll have to take a closer look at Nebula and CuriosityStream. I think they come up in ads enough that they wind up on my mental ad blocker so I’ve never looked closely at them :)
I like Nebula. It’s not too expensive, there’s a lot of great creators, and it’s an easy way to support a variety without subscribing to all sorts of Patreons.
Yeah. I haven’t looked at them yet for that exact reason, but the argument is making sense to me.
Thanks, saving this for the future.
I’d add Electroboom (Electrical Engineering), Tom Stanton (Engineer who makes a lot of engines to fly planes), Crime Pays But Botany Doesn’t (Botany), Periodic Videos (Chemistry), Practical Engineering (Civil Engineering), Nick Zentner (Geology).
Angela Collier has some great stuff on physics, and she’s a great teacher.
Anton Petrov (“Hello, Wonderful Person!”) is quite good IMO.
PBS Space Time and Eons (and as others have already said, Journey to the Microcosmos).
Kurzgesagt is fun and AFAIK always tries to be accurate (they’ve been quick to publish correction videos when necessary).
I’ll second other’s recommendation for CuriosityStream and Standup Maths. Matt’s also part of at least one good podcast, “A Podcast of Unnecessary Detail” which is informative and entertaining.
kurzgesagt is a bit…controversial…when it comes to their “current affairs” content:
for example: their climate science content is blatantly misleading in almost all videos.
they push a kind of “tech optimism” at the cost of presenting practical solutions among other “solutions” that are just straight-up greenwashing bs.
here’s a video that lays it all out, there’s a LOT to cover:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCuy1DaQzWI
that said, their “what if?” and futurology content is excellent!
just have to stay skeptical about anything related to capitalism…including climate change and green tech.
Hmm, I will have to check that out. Thanks.
Journey to the microcosmose is pretty great.
I use Hank’s narrating the episode to help me to sleep, it’s so soothing.
Sad that it’s over now, the footage is absolutely stunning.
Kyle Hill and his Half Life Histories are excellent. The rest of the channel is fun but these are very well researched essays.
ThreeBlueOneBrown is a good math channel, helped me understand calculus way easier than school did.
The Engineering Mindset is a good engineering one, explains how all sorts of things work from inverters to refrigeration to vehicle transmissions
Integza does mostly rocket engineering videos but is very good. 12Tone does music analysis (which I didn’t think I’d be interested in but it’s actually super interesting)
Minute Physics is great as well for general physics in bite size chunks.
What If is by Randall Monroe of XKCD where he answers ridiculous questions using science and math to give serious (if crazy) answers.
BPS.Space builds rockets and is very good at explaining the why of what he’s doing.
Mark Rober is good and hits at about a high school level general science and engineering.
Thought Emporium does mostly bioengineering but ventures into a verity of topics.
Legal Eagle is good at US based law topics.
I will 100% vouch for Nebula. It’s a great service that also directly supports creators more than YouTube does. You can find many educational YouTubers there.
Flammable Maths and matholiger for maths.
Cody’s lab for general crazyness. Currently building a mars base replica.
Al muqaddimah for arab history and kobean history for european history. Dime store adventures for new england history.
Bruce Yeany for small and fun science experiments.
Computerphile. Periodic Videos.
Deep look for (insect) biology.
EEVblog and greatscott for electronics.
Engineerguy for deep dives into products.
NightHawkInLight, NurdRage, for fun diy chemistry.
Sui Generis Brewing for fermenting.
Smarter Every Day, Veritasium
I would classify those as pop science, preferring storytelling to science. A bit too handwavy.
That Veritasium video about electricity was absolute bullshit. For however many minutes long it was, he didn’t once use the word “induction” or try to actually explain anything. The video was basically “electricity is voodoo”. I immediately unsubscribed, and I can’t even stand seeing his face anymore.
If your shitty science video spawns multiple video responses from your betters calling you out on your bullshit, you are a bad science YouTuber and should stop making videos.
The good thing about it is that it can hopefully spark intrigue in some or many.
I remember young self, equally interested in pop science (then magazines).
But yes, the bad part is people thinking they learned something from the videos. It’s mostly entertainment, not reflecting the science honestly.
