This is not my pic because I forgot to screenshot it when I did it. Microsoft has the hardest captcha I have ever had to complete. This one looks easier but I had a similar one that on my phone the images were too small, not recognizable and were more abstract looking shapes. It was so hard, I failed like 8 times (there were several ‘rounds’) and it almost made me second guess whether I might actually be a robot lol. Luckily, there was an audio version where you have to pick from a number of melody recordings and choose the one that was a pattern. Anyone else have trouble with this?

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    People generally already don’t want a ms account, so now they’re making it even harder to get one lol morons

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a fair point. But I’ve always seen it as a choice (sign in with ms, LinkedIn, google, or fb). Which services (besides Microsoft) require a ms account?

        • Theo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          I forget the name but I was looking for free versions of no code app builders to make a productivity app of my own and one did not have a way to sign up with any email only sign up with Google or MS. Also had to create this second MS account, triggering this captcha, originally because I was using MS designer to generate free AI images but the fast tokens run out 15 a day. So to exploit AI, I always use multiple accounts and it is an MS service. I have like 10 MS accounts now due to using up the free OneDrive storage plans.

          Edit: I never connect anything to FB. Meta is the only place that knows my real name and info. (Unfortunately). I also don’t have LinkedIn.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Ah, that makes perfect sense. Also, with all those ms accounts tied to your IP, I can’t blame them for the verification lol

            • Theo@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I do it for all free services. Like AI where you have daily limits. I thought about VPN but I don’t have the cost. It seems the only trusted free tier VPN is Proton bc they have a paid plan. I read good reviews and it didn’t seem to slow down anything noticeably.

              • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I didn’t mean to sound like I disapproved at all. I’m all for what you’re doing haha I’ve use proton’s free tier. They’re fine. I just don’t really trust any vpn company that’s based in the USA, due to their (completely understandable) requirement to keep USA data collection laws.

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I fucking hate captchas with a passion. They make me violent. Captchas should be illegal for the sake of my mental health. As a VPN user I see them 10x more than the average person.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      Honestly captchas and the enshittification of the internet has completely driven me away from tech. Its become so user hostile that it simply is no longer worth the effort. There have been times where just to access a page I have to do five rounds of captchas.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, also, where did all the fun stuff go? Now it’s just rage bait AI generated “articles” that pushes the dopamine button.

        Where are 3D printer projects, robots, science, the arts, longevity science, DIY, and so on?

        Mustn’t we build a new internet without the idea that you should earn a living from whatever you do there?

      • daggermoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah I feel that. I spend lots of time on my computer offline. I got games, music, movies, even some books. I’m pretty much set. Part of me does want to run away and live in the woods though.

  • m_f@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pretty sure any decent model could easily solve that anyways. To borrow a quote about bears from the National Park Service, there’s now significant overlap between your dumbest users and the smartest AI.

    • JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      Pretty sure any decent model could easily solve that anyways.

      True, but often these things also track the mouse movements or touch inputs and analyse those to see if they match natural human input or not. Of course advanced AI would be able to simulate proper inputs but most bots today would fail this check.

    • Theo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I am usually good at puzzles but this was hard to see on my phone. The pictures were much smaller in my version compared to the image. It wasn’t an intelligence issue, it was a vision issue. Yet, many sites still just use a check box even the bank I work for does. Bigger companies than MS use a checkbox.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The checkbox is only the first step. When it’s a google recapcha, cloudflare, etc that have the checkbox, this is the trigger to check. It sees how long since you loaded the page to when the checkbox is checked, how the mouse moved (perfectly straight line or instant jump to position indicates bot), and other info they have about previous visits (they store a cookie on your PC and when you go to another site they know where you have been and can compare that against the much higher risk of a blank slate user or against whether you’ve tried the same form 100 times).

        If you pass that, as 90%+ of users should, then you see no more. If you are like me, you use a VPN and fail the first check and have to do endless recapcha “click on the busses” until you give up and quit the site.

        I hate the google ones. Not only do they make life unbearable for people with VPNs, they use the info about what sites you visit to sell ads. And half the time you don’t even know because the recapcha is the hidden in page one not the one in the form when you click the box.

        The cloudflare ones are nicer. They virtually always pass me even though I’m behind a VPN, and although they technically can track me across sites (and probably do to track threat level), they aren’t in the business of selling ads based on that data.

        I have also generally had a nice experience with hCapcha. And recently I came across one that is using proof of work, mCaptcha - not sure what to think on that as it probably uses excess energy but it’s nice to have your computer sort it out in the background. The idea here is a sort of rate limit. It takes a few seconds to do the work to pass the test (variable difficulty depending on how many accesses are happening on the site - i.e. whether they are under attack), but it all happens in the background while you fill the form in so you don’t notice. It slows down bots but doesn’t really detect them - more of a rate limiter or something designed to reduce the cost effectiveness of bots.

        Thank you for coming to my ted talk.

  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I got this one the other day during a checkout process. This site lost the sale, I couldn’t crack it.

    • ramchak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 days ago

      I would have picked the only picture of a dog. Bees and Tapirs/Capybaras don’t seem to fit

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Me and all my friends agree, but the site did not accept that as the correct answer. I originally took that picture to get a second opinion and make sure I wasn’t going crazy heh. I even tried for a new captcha, and it was still nonsense.

        We did it, we beat AI. And humans.

    • loam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      That one is terrible. I assume by “object” they mean “dog wearing accessories”. That captcha was made to trick humans.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 days ago

    So, it’s a little known fact that captchas and such like no longer test to see if you can solve something, because the bots have evolved to pass those kinds of tests.

    They also tried to set them up to succeed where humans failed, but then bots evolved to pass those, too.

    So now they look at how you fail or pass, or how you keep trying. Basically, they’re checking if you’re human by seeing how you respond to frustration.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        well, there’s that too.

        Kind of a “we need to put this out there anyway” kind of thing…

        The way they verify you’re human is how you respond, but they’re also getting you to train AI’s while they do it.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think we’re way past the need for an “if you can’t auto detect bots then that’s a you problem, dog” legislation. I guess you could be boring and call it anti-hostile experience regulation or whatever. but this shit needs to die like most Google projects.

    • Theo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      A few years ago when I was in college, I would’ve been able to solve that equation probably but that information has since left my brain lol.

      • morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yup same, i looked it up and it all came back. However, it’s still a completely useless knowledge in my normal adult life, though i’m a software engineer

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Calc was extremely useful to me as an industrial engineer and thank fuck I only have to understand it instead of actually doing it in my profession

        • Theo@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Much of the math I learned was memorizing steps. If it came up in real life I probably wouldn’t be able to piece all necessary info into an equation. Even a word problem is assumed to include the minimum. I am not a software engineer nor a programmer (yet) I am learning python supposedly a good precursor since my bg is in web design. The way i see it, all forms of logic while they don’t have a direct applied use in my life, serve as an exercising of my mind and can help understand inconsistencies and other logic/reasoning concepts. They are indirectly related.

    • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      My solution:

      The outer square lines in the third column/row is the result of the difference between what exists in the first two items in that row/column. Only outer lines appearing only once will be in the 3rd shape. The center lines seem to be only center lines that appear in both shapes. Therefore x is 52, since all outer shapes cancel and there are no shared center lines. The rest is fairly simple.

      The second derivative of f(x) is 78x + 22, so the answer is 78(52) + 22 + 52 = 4130

      I’m not completely confident in this solution but it seems to be consistent with the known columns and rows.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Claude 3.5 sonnet seems to think the answer is 23

      CharGPT o1 thinks it’s 6, but the formula answer is 496 and just a “bonus”

      o1 also “thought” about for a LONG TIME 1 minute and 11 seconds, which is the longest I’ve ever been able to get it to “think” about anything LMAO\

      • Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Notice how it doesn’t explain what’s going on in the pattern that got it to number 6. It’s just a guess. If push comes to shove, anyone can make a straight faced lie that whatever option is the correct answer, they’ll just avoid explaining it.

      • morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        no, you need to derivate the f(x) function twice because the last line asks for f"(x). you do that by taking down the exponent in front of each power of the polynomial and decreasing the power by one each time you derivate.

        So for the 13x³: derived once it becomes 3 times 13 x², which equals 39x². Derived a second time, it is 2 times 39x, so 78x.

        The 11x² becomes 2 times 11x, and then just 22 (times x power zero). the rest disappears after two derivatives.

        The x is given when finding the correct pattern that matches the missing symbol in the first part of the problem, being the dot, so 52. I explained how you find this in a comment somewhere up here :)

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Pretty sure 78x + 22 is f double prime of x. So f’’(x) + x simplifies to 79x + 22.

          I found the other posts about XOR for solving the visual puzzle.

        • letsgo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          f’‘(x) is 78x+22 but the question asks what number is f’'(x) + x, hence 79x+22.

      • morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        no the correct pattern is 52, using the following method:

        • for each column, superpose the outer diagonal lines of the first and second pattern, lines that appear in both symbols are suppressed in the third (bottom) pattern, lines that only appear in one of the two first patterns are kept.
        • for each column, superpose the clock hands of the first and second pattern, only keep the clock hands that appear in both symbols at the same position.

        The third column has the same diagonal lines in the first and second pattern, so they disappear. Those two symbols have different clock hands so they also disappear. So the only remaining element in the pattern is the central dot (52).

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Apparently if you wanted to *defeat AI you just need to ask the user how many R’s there are in strawberry.

    *edit because dictation is stupid

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    Rapidly getting into the “overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists” levels of captcha

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hey man, I don’t like Chicago either, but to say that their football players are all dumb? I’m sure they’re reasonably smart…

    • Theo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just feel jipped bc my version of the orbits and numbers were all jumbles so you couldn’t tell which orbit pertained to which number.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve been staring at this thing for like 30 seconds, and I have zero clue what it’s asking you to do.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        But…9 is on a different orbit. It’ll collide with the teal chess piece. Then we’ll have chess pieces floating in space for all eternity!

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          and if you fail too many times and they collide then you’ll initiate a cascading reaction of ever-more-destroyed chess pieces, invalidating entire orbits, and rendering every possible orbit uninhabitable.

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is simple arrows at the bottom which changes availiable images. They just change orbits on different images and when it’s in correct orbit click submit

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m tired of looking at clear, easy to spot traffic lights that I get 100% right but have to do page after page of them because I’m using a VPN. If it’s not important I will give up on a site using reCaptcha.

    • Theo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      The version I did had smaller circles, more abstract and nearly indistinguishable symbols and shapes and the numbers were scattered throughout the orbits. Some numbers were in between and it took a few seconds to figure out what orbit they were ‘labeling’. Also as you scrolled through the options, it seemed as if none fit the appropriate answer so I defaulted to the audio.

  • viralJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    They should just make a captcha that asks how many 'r’s in ‘strawberry’.

  • woodenskewer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Someone shared with me having to calculate the resistance of a resistor once. I sent them the color band chart to figure it out lol