Can you show the data? Because I find it extremely hard to believe multimillionaires would take the bus instead of being driven into the city in their limo.
And you’re making assumptions about what “rich” means.
People only making half a million are rich. They still drive their own car. Those are most of the personal vehicles being driven in Manhattan.
The people you’re thinking of, are the wealthy. There are only a few hundred of those people in the city, they aren’t a major driver of traffic anyway, so nobody cares about them.
I claimed the fee means that now only the rich are driving in NYC. You said the data said that’s not true. Yes, the poor outnumber the rich. I didn’t question that. The poor can no longer afford to drive into NYC making it a new luxury for the rich. They no longer have to deal with the poors on the road with them. The rich aren’t going to take a bus to save $9.
That was the claim. The drop in traffic, proves that’s not the case.
Your new idea that “now only the rich are driving in NYC” always was the case anyway. The middle class and lower don’t bother owning cars in NYC. The public transit being the best in the nation, and permanent parking spaces to store your car costing hundreds of dollars per month, after the cost of the car and insurance that everyone everywhere pays; most born and raised NYers don’t even have drivers licenses, because cars are such a waste of money there.
You realize congestion heading into the city improves, if the traffic within the city gets better? The roads are all connected. They all effect each other.
Can you show the data? Because I find it extremely hard to believe multimillionaires would take the bus instead of being driven into the city in their limo.
The data this whole thread is about.
And you’re making assumptions about what “rich” means.
People only making half a million are rich. They still drive their own car. Those are most of the personal vehicles being driven in Manhattan.
The people you’re thinking of, are the wealthy. There are only a few hundred of those people in the city, they aren’t a major driver of traffic anyway, so nobody cares about them.
Is there any data that shows people making $500k a year are deterred by a $9 fee?
Going to work 5 days a week, 50 weeks a year is $2,250. The average garage price is $15 a day.
The lower traffic numbers are the data. That’s what the screen shot shows. None of the bridges or tunnels are backed up.
I claimed the fee means that now only the rich are driving in NYC. You said the data said that’s not true. Yes, the poor outnumber the rich. I didn’t question that. The poor can no longer afford to drive into NYC making it a new luxury for the rich. They no longer have to deal with the poors on the road with them. The rich aren’t going to take a bus to save $9.
That was the claim. The drop in traffic, proves that’s not the case.
Your new idea that “now only the rich are driving in NYC” always was the case anyway. The middle class and lower don’t bother owning cars in NYC. The public transit being the best in the nation, and permanent parking spaces to store your car costing hundreds of dollars per month, after the cost of the car and insurance that everyone everywhere pays; most born and raised NYers don’t even have drivers licenses, because cars are such a waste of money there.
The map doesn’t show traffic inside NYC by NYC residents. It shows commuters going into NYC.
You realize congestion heading into the city improves, if the traffic within the city gets better? The roads are all connected. They all effect each other.