• Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Non exaggerated non explicit comments without enough context deserve to be taken seriously. Sadly.

    • Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      sadly I have to take a comment about how males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        O shit you were serious?? Thabks for misinterpreting my comment btw. Let me correct that for you.

        sadly I have to take a comment justifying sexist generalizations on men because males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously.

        It’s not the part about men having more priviledges that people are having issues with, it’s the part that THAT somehow excuses being sexist against men.

        • Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          22 hours ago

          if males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality

          • tjsauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            20 hours ago

            By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.

            The words you use are good, but the context is bad.