Davel linked an article by Rockhill that goes into detail. But if you’d read “Against the Double Blackmail” you’d think calling his views neoliberal is a very charitable take considering he spent most of the book being horribly racist and chauvinistic whenever he wasn’t horribly incoherent.
Which is to be expected of anyone proudly calling himself an eurocentrist. Just because somebody goes and says they’re a Marxist or a historical materialist or whatever doesn’t make it so, you have to look at their praxis. There’s been “Marxist” opportunists for as long as there’s been Marxism.
Davel linked an article by Rockhill that goes into detail. But if you’d read “Against the Double Blackmail” you’d think calling his views neoliberal is a very charitable take considering he spent most of the book being horribly racist and chauvinistic whenever he wasn’t horribly incoherent.
Which is to be expected of anyone proudly calling himself an eurocentrist. Just because somebody goes and says they’re a Marxist or a historical materialist or whatever doesn’t make it so, you have to look at their praxis. There’s been “Marxist” opportunists for as long as there’s been Marxism.