• Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Getting the money over 20 years seems so stupid, it won’t give you any interest and over 20 years just because of inflation it will be probably worse than 50% less…

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      And yet at 40 million a year, I don’t think inflation is going to bother you ever again. That’s good advice for relatively small payouts like 10k, but at a certain point the annuity becomes an effectively unlimited credit line.

    • Nora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Plus, if the company goes out of business, you’re fucked.

      • H1jAcK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        At least in my state, the lottery is run by the state government. The taxes from it go to schools.

          • Boeman@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 day ago

            I mean, the taxes from the lottery do. What that don’t tell us is the taxes originally earmarked for schools now go to something else.

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      That depends entirely on how good you are at managing your money. With regular payments you’d still have a ridiculous amount of money even the first month, and no matter how badly you fuck up you’re still rich 20 years from now.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That wouldn’t work to reduce lottery taxes. The lottery itself isn’t return on investment in stocks or whatever, and can’t be held indefinitely the way an appreciating stock can.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yeah I was referring to specifically taking a lump sum and what to do with it as opposed to taking the payment plan

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The merits of lump sum versus annuity aside, the point is that the headline number comes from a naive total of how many payments are made in the annuity option. So when it’s listed as a $2 billion jackpot, it’s actually worth something closer to half of that as a lump sum.