• Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Direct action is meaningless if you’re hostile to building a coalition broad enough to actually gain any significant political power.

    Spoken like someone who’s never done organizing, participated in protests or any other direct action. You’re a keyboard warrior who’s probably never even interacted with a socialist IRL.

    this is a democracy and without votes going to candidates who can win, it is ultimately meaningless.

    Not a democracy and also I already gave 2 examples showing the contrary.

    I remember being young and convinced socialism was the way forward. Then I grew the fuck up and did some introspection.

    No need to be a condescending dick. I’m also guessing I’m older than you, not that it’s relevant.

    • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve participated in dozens of protests. Protests with political organization can lead to change. Protests without political organization are just yelling at a wall.

      No need to be a condescending dick.

      If you don’t want someone to take offense at what you write, don’t smugly tell them to learn introspection. Act like an arrogant dick, get treated like an arrogant dick.

      • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Protests with political organization can lead to change. Protests without political organization are just yelling at a wall.

        Right… I’m not sure why you think I’m not in favor of organized resistance.

        If you don’t want someone to take offense at what you write, don’t smugly tell them to learn introspection. Act like an arrogant dick, get treated like an arrogant dick.

        You were doing a “both sides” between anarchists and fascists, eerily similar to Trump, while claiming to be “left leaning”. I think my response was warranted, if not understated. But frankly, that’s plain ignorant.

        • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like I said, attempting to degrade the only left leaning political coalition means someone is hostile to any sort of positive left leaning activism. If that doesn’t describe a given anarchist, then what I said doesn’t apply to them. If it does, then they might as well be a Trumpster.

          • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who or what is this sole “left leaning political coalition”? If you’re referring to Democrats they are neither left leaning nor a coalition. They are a center-right political party. Coalition implies multiple parties. And the Democratic party isn’t exactly known for activism, unless you’re counting fundraising events.

            • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Suuuuuure they’re right leaning.

              And the Democratic party isn’t exactly known for activism

              They’re the only hope for getting anything actually done, like the climate change actions taken by Biden. I don’t always agree with the Democratic Party, but nobody other than them or Republicans are organized better than a herd of cats or numerous enough to win office, so…

              • holland@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                hey’re the only hope for getting anything actually done, like the climate change actions taken by Biden.

                HAHAHAHA…

                You mean his approving more oil drilling than Trump?

              • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re the only hope for getting anything actually done, like the climate change actions taken by Biden.

                Then we’re fucked. Because idk if you’ve noticed, but the planet is still dying. We are well on our way to passing the point of no return.

                but nobody other than them or Republicans are organized better than a herd of cats or numerous enough to win office, so…

                This actually has nothing to do with popularity or ability to organize. Its a problem with how our constitution is written, primarily the fact that we use first passed the post, see Duverger’s law.

                • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Then we’re fucked. Because idk if you’ve noticed, but the planet is still dying. We are well on our way to passing the point of no return.

                  You’re right. What’s been done so far won’t fully solve the problem. Better undermine support for people trying to get what can be done, done, and then doom all over the Internet.

                  This actually has nothing to do with popularity or ability to organize

                  Nah, even in areas with ranked choice voting, third parties are jokes. Don’t get me wrong, I’m in favor of reforms designed to allow them a more reasonable and equal access to the political levers of power, but the two most significant third parties are the Greens and Libertarians. Neither one is a political force, and not just because of first past the post voting. Niche, ideologically focused parties will always underperform wide coalitions within democracies.

                  • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’re right. What’s been done so far won’t fully solve the problem. Better undermine support for people trying to get what can be done, done, and then doom all over the Internet.

                    The libs are the ones undermining the progress. It ought to be self evident by now that radical measures need to be taken, and that the markets will not solve the climate crisis, the kind of regulation we need would kill entire sectors of the economy. Even when it comes to moderate improvements, Democrats are obstructed by both the minority opposition and members of their own party (as libs are always quick to remind me).

                    The Democrats will never be able to do what needs to get done. So you undermine the chance for meaningful change when you tell people, “don’t worry, Biden is on it, just vote and everything will be fine”.

                    Nah, even in areas with ranked choice voting, third parties are jokes. Don’t get me wrong, I’m in favor of reforms designed to allow them a more reasonable and equal access to the political levers of power, but the two most significant third parties are the Greens and Libertarians. Neither one is a political force, and not just because of first past the post voting. Niche, ideologically focused parties will always underperform wide coalitions within democracies.

                    Which areas? Areas in the US? Yeah, hundreds of years of entrenched power at the local, State, and federal level will do that. Would take time and likely ranked choice at the federal level to change.