• passepartout@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Those examples you listed are not really modern imo. I’m not an UI/UX expert though.

    I used Hugo to build my personal website. You can also easily build blogs with it. The difference to the usual approach is that you “code” the website in markdown which makes it super easy. Hugo then generates the html and css for you, which gets statically hosted. Check out the showcases and themes if you’re interested. I used a theme called papermod, it’s pretty common.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Agree on Hugo being easy to work with. I also think having a static website is a good idea in general due to the low resource usage. My Raspberry Pi, even though it is loaded with many web applications, always manages to serve my hugo website blazingly fast. If you need rich content, for example videos, you can always embed them in some way. Another option I tried that worked okay is Pelican, though I use Hugo now since it seems the better option for me. In general I think any static site generator with templates will do the job. Even a minimalist solution such as pandoc could do it, though it would be much more manual work to get working.

      • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Static websites are also cool for security.

        So many small websites gets defaced everyday because of some vuln brought by the dynamic aspect of the site.

    • kill_dash_nine@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would also second Hugo which I use for my personal site and blog which I haven’t updated for a long time. Nice thing is that it has a minimal footprint of needing to watch out for updates unlike something like Wordpress which was known for being vulnerable stable if left unmaintained. It’s mostly looking out for old themes with vulnerable javascript.

      Another popular options is Jekyll and I honestly can’t remember why I picked Hugo over it but if you don’t need dynamic content, why make things more complex?

  • bob@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Learn html and CSS then create a simple static website. It’s a lot easier than it sounds, Mozilla has great documentation.

  • snorkbubs@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My answer is probably boring, but it works, and I had fun with my own. Just set up Wordpress. At this point, you can find templates for any site design imaginable, and there are a million plugins for it. It’s an all-around solid platform, that has mountains of documentation. Wordpress was made for blogging, can’t go wrong there, but I’ve used it for all kinds of stuff, including ecommerce. It’s simple and effective enough that I have a hard time going any other direction.

    I used to host Wordpress sites on a home LAMP server; it was a fun project that didn’t cause a bunch of headaches, mainly because of the amount of available documentation. Search “wordpress self-host” and you’ll find a whole lot of information.

    Good luck with whatever you decide on!

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with WordPress and the like is maintenance. If you don’t keep it up to date, it will get taken by malware. Guaranteed. Any plugins you add increase the risk.

      I moved my blog to a markdown based compiled site a long time ago so I didn’t have to worry about that upkeep.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m yet to understand why people downvote comments like yours. Your answer was on-topic, provided a reasoning, was well-written… even if I haven’t fully recovered from the trauma of having two wordpress sites hacked, I still think your comment has merit.

      • Deebster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It turns out that people on Lemmy are no better responsibly using a downvote button than anywhere else. I think you should have to at least select a reason why you’re downvoting to add some friction - maybe options something like “I don’t like this”, “I disagree”, “This is factually incorrect”, “Spam”, “Abusive language”, etc. Then you can filter out the first two!