• rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    hammering a deal-breaker for you will cause me to change my mind

    I don’t understand this part of your sentence.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You keep bringing up that zoos cause harm. This seems to be a deal-breaker for you. It seems your view is that if it’s possible to achieve some amount of your goal without causing harm, you should do that, even if causing a small amount of harm would enable you much greater success in whatever it is you’re after. In my view, it’s acceptable to cause a small amount of harm, if you get significantly greater good from doing so. Of course the details matter, and I don’t believe either of us would argue our position in every scenario, but in this case I find the manageable harm caused by zoos to be worth the increased interest in wildlife conservation.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It seems your view is that if it’s possible to achieve some amount of your goal without causing harm, you should do that, even if causing a small amount of harm would enable you much greater success in whatever it is you’re after.

        It seems to me that we have different goals.

        manageable harm

        Obdurate.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well wait, what’s your goal? Because one of my goals is maximize environmental conservation.

          • rah@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Because one of my goals is maximize environmental conservation.

            The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Maybe get over the idea that human actions are needed in order to conserve the environment.

            • Liz@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I mean, there are people out there who would destroy the environment if we just sat back and did nothing so… Yeah gotta take action.

              • rah@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                LOL, we’ve got to hurt animals by imprisoning them and charging tickets for people to ogle at them, because otherwise bad people will do bad things. I see.

                • Liz@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You’re not very good at thinking beyond immediate consequences, are you?

                  • rah@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    You have no idea what I’m good or not good at. Nor could you from this very limited exchange. You just want to find a reason to dismiss what I’ve said so that you can remain unchallenged in your bubble where you’re saving the world and other people are the problem.