Hundreds of intellectuals and artists are concerned about its implications for freedom of expression, while police, lawyers, and prosecutors consider it too imprecise.
  • frostbiker@lemmy.caEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    Burning a symbol to upset people is a shitty thing to do, but it should not be illegal.

    Assaulting people, whether they burned a symbol you like or not, is a shitty thing to do that should remain illegal.

    And yes, some people in my country have burned symbols that represent people like me recently. Nobody from my community assaulted the people who did it in response. Just the way it should be.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      The burning of qurans is clearly meant to incite hate and violence though, and frankly people shouldn’t be burning anything in public anyways.

      They’re still perfectly free to invite anyone to their backyard book burnings, don’t act like this is some authoritarian limit on freedom, this is an active intervention to PRESERVE freedom from the nazis who want to take it from us.

      • frostbiker@lemmy.caEnglish
        1·
        10 months ago

        I do not approve of burning holy books, but I think it should be legal.

        What people shouldn’t do and what should be banned are different things. I don’t want to live in a place where what is not mandatory is banned. There has to be some room for freedom of expression, even for people expressing ideas we dislike.

        • Syndic@feddit.deEnglish
          0·
          10 months ago

          There has to be some room for freedom of expression, even for people expressing ideas we dislike.

          And there still is plenty of room of public expression of opinions without burning a book representing a religious group. Seriously there are thousands of ways to do so.

          But European countries did learn some lessons and that’s why some actions such as calling for religious or other minority groups to be killed or to intimindate such groups with displays of violence isn’t allowed in many of them. And burning a religious book in public is such an act of intimidation which serves absolutely no constructive purpose. That’s why many European countries don’t allow such behaviour.

          • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyzEnglish
            1·
            10 months ago

            You act like there would be less of a reaction if people ripped up, walked on, or in other ways desecrated the Quran. This isn’t about book burning, this is about a group of people not tolerating that on of their symbols is desecrated.

            Imagine if we prosecuted people for burning flags or signs with slogans… but maybe you think that should be illegal as well?

          • Fifteen_Two@lemmy.caEnglish
            0·
            10 months ago

            Doyou care if I burn a stack of paper? Then you shouldn’t care if I burn a fucking book.

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
              1·
              10 months ago

              I certainly care if you burn a stack of paper in the middle of the street, there’s no good reason to do it and it’s a public danger.

              • frostbiker@lemmy.caEnglish
                1·
                10 months ago

                Okay, people will rip the holy book of the week instead. You may not have a good reason to do it, but others should be free to do so.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          11·
          10 months ago

          I do not approve of burning books, full stop. I couldn’t care less whose imaginary friend the book is or isn’t about.

          But I completely agree that the government should categorically not be legislating which books you can and cannot burn. Burning a book is a form of free speech. It’s often offensive to many people, but it’s still important - if for no other reason than it lets the people doing the burning show their true colors.