• DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can you be more specific? What do you mean by It’s amazing how often the Israeli military does that? Are there any other recent instances where they tied people on the hoods of vehicles?

    The article states they did stuff like this in the second intifada but were banned from doing so by the Israeli Supreme Court. Although there have been “reports” of similar incidents since then.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Based on the rest of the comment, I think they were referring to how often members of the Israeli military defy orders.

        • Doorbook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Here an easy resource from a website that usually have receipt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes?wprov=sfti1

          Here is some notes to help you with wikipedia.

          • you read the overall sentence. Usually it ends with a source or multiple. Usually news article, research paper, books, blogs and many other form.

          • sometimes you can open the link to it is own specific page which usually have more details.

          • if you are not sure about a specific incident or don’t like the wordings, you can:

          1. select the incident title or information
          2. right mouse click.
          3. choose “Copy” from the menu
          4. open a search engine, it is a website that you can write things into and it will gave you information about you can check put.
          5. put the text you copied into the search bar
          6. click search
          7. you will see a list of information about the incident
          8. read
          9. understand
          • if that doesn’t work you can always ask in a new post about where to find more information about the topic you are interested in.
    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m sorry that the IDF war crimes have been creatively diverse enough that they don’t need to do the same exact thing twice for your liking.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      And now we have so-called “videos” of them doing it. Before you know it, there’ll be actual “proof” and stuff.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          So what’s the required number of videos to convince galactic geniuses such as yourself? 2? 12? Or do we just move the goalposts after every bit of information comes out that doesn’t support your opinion? That seems to be how it works, or you just switch to “lalala, I can’t hear you”…

          Israel will be on the wrong side of history on this, and it won’t even take long.

        • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          We also have statements from the IDF that this actually happened. It’s in the linked article. In the first sentence.

          • DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            4 months ago

            Omg thank you!

            "In violation of orders and standard operating procedures,

            This claim is miles away from saying they committed a war crime. Thank you so much!

            • Krzd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 months ago

              What? That’s literally a confirmation‽
              You can only do something in violation of orders by actually doing it. Therefore -> “in violation of orders” translates to “they did X in violation of orders”