• Froyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    If the only complaint about the premise was an attempt to help out non-insiders, with personal assets under 100k, then scratch that MAYBE off and let’s write some legislature.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Very few people with personal assets under 100k are buying individual stocks to begin with. Normal working-class people, if they’re saving at all, are very likely just buying mutual funds inside their retirement accounts.

      Frankly, you’d have to really be trying in order to be in the tiny Venn diagram intersection of people who would (a) be screwed by the above commenter’s proposal and (b) deserve sympathy for it. IMO it’s not worth carving out an exception for.

      • kewjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Companies issue stock grants in lieu of additional salary to incentivise employees to stay. any impact to stocks would also take away money from labor.

        would also open up corporate warfare to who can fund corporate espionage or politicians to close down competitors.