• kerrigan778@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re talking small commune living then the onus of doing that stuff gets shared by as many people as are able and it’s hard work but it’s shared. If you’re talking greater socialist society it gets done the same way as it’s done now, but the people who do it get paid a much larger share of the value their labor creates and it is incentived to ease the burden where possible because you can’t treat the workers as disposable and cheap.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      people who do it get paid a much larger share of the value their labor creates

      That’s the tricky part. Without a permanent dictatorship of the proletariat, you have the masses determine value. “The state will wither.” is hand-wavy in the extreme. If the people determine value, that results in Glen Beck being worth hundreds of millions in value while school teachers get minimal just like today.

      “A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it.”

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, totalitarianism is idiotic whether it’s communist in nature or not. A healthy representative democracy with well protected labor unions, employee/government owned services and allowment of free pursuit makes much more sense and is not incompatible with communism.

        Though note, I’m not really a communist in that particular sense, I tend to be in favor of a mixed economy with strong union protections and with essential and beneficial services being operated for the public good.