As the story stands, we probably don’t have anything showing intent to suppress free speech, which is what I supposed to lawsuit would be based on. It’s possible that there’s information we don’t know yet, or that isn’t written in the article, but at the moment I don’t think a lawsuit would get very far.

This is one of those situations where it feels like you ought to be able to sue, but maybe the best remedy is by voting in different state-level politicians.