I find it pretty interesting that kagi is rated as Terrible search engine, even ChatGPT preforms better.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What a huge wall of text, so horribly formatted using a very ineligible font and it looks awful on the phone.

    Plus it is kind of dumb to measure search engines based on such a low number of queries. You are introducing a huge bias and the generated search results are ranked by a single person also introducing his own bias. The idea is interesting the execution not so much.

    • cyruseuros@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Idk, doing this “properly” would take an immense amount of effort and manpower. This feels more like a “let me get enough info for an educated guess” EDA process, which still seems to have taken a lot of effort and I appreciate it a lot.

      • akrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        But basing a recommendation on a ballpark anectdotal evidence is eidiculous.

        • cyruseuros@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Did he actually recommend one? That said, it’s obvious the author favors Marginalia personally, but there’s no point pretending they don’t have biases. At least for me, making them obvious helps.