The question is: do you want a senile person or a career prosecutor as a president?
The question is: do you want a senile person or a career prosecutor as a president?
It’s way easier to run a campaign this way, though. Who wants to acknowledge that the US issues are structural and require solutions that would go against the lobbyists and donors’ best interests?
They are going to pull the same trick, that is “our candidate isn’t the other guy”
I’m sure that herding behind a senile will give the Democratic Party the incentive to reconsider their corporate-oriented outlook /s
Cincinnatus would.
most of them are being mined in politically unstable or to western civilization unfriendly countries, with terrible effect on the environment.
Has that ever stopped everyone, though?
I witnessed Berlusconi’s rise and fall: putting corrupt business people in government isn’t a great idea
They will do genocide for just one day.
That’s how bad the situation is: McCain is an example of someone who wanted to do the best for American democracy.
“They’re actively trying to make me reconsider my stance on genocide” = shady psy-op by an evil power that wants to control the world?
Or depression. Or anxiety. Or learning disabilities.
"Popular men, tey must create strange monsters, and then quell 'hem ; to make their artes seeme something. "
We do fire drills once or twice a year where I live (not the US). I’ve been around for forty years and I’ve met only two people with a firearm licence (both for shooting sport-related reasons). The European mind can understand the historical reasons beyond the 2nd Amendment, but not the fetishization of firearms.
Or “you could have bought a house”
But his trial was political /s
The first iterations of Google Now felt useful in a similar way. Google was already squeezing data out of me, but it did so by marketing a palatable service.
Limitless paper in a paperless world
If you wrestle igs in the mud, they will win because they have more experience.