Ehh it’s about building a powerful international worker syndicate that can replace the state as painlessly as possible. So you’re technically right, but your comment is misleading in the context of the one you responded to.

What about word of mouth? If I want to find a good place to eat, I find asking a local “hey what’s the best restaurant around here?” to yield way better results than ads.

I feel sorry for Americans. The best of the 2 viable parties is a party keen on supplying a genocide, and somehow if you vote 3rd party you’re more responsible than said genocide suppliers, even worse republicans, and non-voters. That’s wild.

The uncomfortable reality is that you aren’t gonna solve your country’s problems in the voting booths. Good luck to you, genuinely.

This is native while termux is emulated, I think.

I agree with you, and I use it that same way. But I think it should be something the user explicitly seeks out. The problem is that everyone who uses Google now unintentionally use an LLM in the exact same way they’ve always found human-written content. It’s fundamentally different content, so shoving it into the existing interface is begging for confusion.

The main problem I see is that Google just shouldn’t include AI results. And they definitely shouldn’t put their unreliable LLM front and center on the results page. When you google something, you want accurate information, which the LLM might have, but only if that data was readily available to begin with. So the stuff it can help with is stuff the search would put first already.

For anything requiring critical thought or research, the LLM will often hallucinate or misrepresent. The danger is that people do not always apply critical thinking. Defaulting to showing an LLM response is extremely dangerous, and it’s basically pointless.