AI, at it again.

I mean, why not both?

Soon-to-be former doctor.

But I doubt that will make him regret what he did. He’ll probably blame the “woke leftists” for “silencing him”.

The final hilarity would be Elon forcing Twitter to re-enable SMS based tweets, then hackers using it to fake tweets from Elon himself.

It’s one happy meal, Ellen. What could it cost, $25?

That way, in a few years, they can announce a bigger commitment for positive PR that they have no intention of keeping.

“Corporate commitments to environmental problems turn out to just be fluff for positive PR”

Someone told them the problem was just “too many variables”, so they figured by taking away sensors, there are fewer variables. Therefore, better self-driving.

It’s still nowhere near any standard we should expect to trust this technology, which is a flawed solution to a problem that doesn’t really exist.

I believe a huge chunk of Tesla’s valuation is based on their automation tech, despite having very little real success towards full automation. So they have to focus on that and try to prove they can deliver.

But I’m guessing they won’t succeed, as there are fundamental flaws with the technology itself, that can’t be solved by throwing more sensors at the problem.

Companies have lied to the public, hidden facts, and spewed propaganda for decades.

I think the public has every right to seize the assets and wealth of these companies as compensation.

Lol last time I went to best buy for that they were out of stock despite their website saying otherwise.

I think the only thing I’ve bought from them in the last decade were some external hard drives, which I shucked and threw in my NAS

The majority of my time isn’t spent writing code; it’s reading code, reviewing changes, and thinking about code.

It doesn’t actually need to make money at the moment, just drive value for shareholders.

If you ask them to respond like a politician they answer all your questions with something completely different.

Some are saying it’ll correct this year, but I’m not holding my breath…

Precisely. And if someone can’t be convinced not to spend thousands of their own money on a transportation method in order to cover less than 1% of their trips, I don’t think they can be convinced at all.

I mean, I wasn’t even talking about cottaging, yet you insisted on bringing it into the conversation. You seem to want coverage for specific “edge cases” but I don’t think you’re open to any actual things that address those.

Solutions that cover a majority of use cases are better anyways. These edge cases are minor problems that aren’t relevant to the majority of transportation needs.

Going to a cottage once a year doesn’t require you own a car for the whole year.

Sometimes it’s both of those things.