• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 29 days ago
cake
Cake day: December 12th, 2024

help-circle
  • As hard as it may be to believe, I can’t eat metaphysics for put a roof above my head with it. Even Plato didn’t sit on perfect abstract chairs or ate abstract apples.

    Here’s another argument I thought of in the meanwhile:

    1. If we accept that the rule of golden mean is universal, then it necessarily applies to itself. Thus, the correct use of the rule is somewhere between the absolutes of not applying it at all and applying it to everything. There are circumstances in which it shouldn’t be used.

    2. If we don’t accept the rule as universally true, then there are circumstances in which it shouldn’t be used.

    QED



  • Depends on the type of distribution too. In some discrete cases there isn’t a mean value. A binary choice for example has no applicability of the golden mean. Like a two party system. If neither represents your values, you can only choose the one that mostly does. Which is not the optimal outcome, just the local maxima.

    The golden mean argument also assumes that there is only one good soulution, where multiple equally good ones can exist too.


  • While I agree that most things require a compromise of two extremes, it is also important to acknowledge how they could result in worse outcomes.

    Eg 1: You are sick; the doctor prescribes antibiotics. But you have some concerns about them so you only take it until you feel better.

    But now the pathogen is still there, and it will rebound with new strength. (there’s also a chance it becomes resistant due to selective pressure and its survival)

    Eg 2: Compromise of democracy and authoritarian state. Those countries’ governments tend to be more stable and enduring that are either of the two, but not a middle of the road. This is why the transition from one to the other is usually turbulent as well.