So to get this straight.
She was speaking, interrupted, took back her turn, and that’s what you’re upset about?
Would you rather go back to Biden who just sits there while other people talk over him?
So to get this straight.
She was speaking, interrupted, took back her turn, and that’s what you’re upset about?
Would you rather go back to Biden who just sits there while other people talk over him?
If you had lunch with a friend, took a picture, and posted it online, would it have been to “show off”? Ask yourself why you’re making that assumption about the subjects of this photo.
Agreed, this is pretty gross.
I tried one of these video screening interviews once. It’s very unfriendly to the neuro-atypical. Gave up about halfway through, because I was on the verge of a stress-induced panic attack and figured the job wasn’t worth it with this kind of hoop to apply.
This sounds like just another way of saying “ideas guy”.
I get a lot of “can you just make me a checklist I can follow.”
I’m teaching computer networking and this hits the nail on the head. My students are plenty willing to learn answers to multiple choice questions. However, it is like pulling teeth trying to give them anything even slightly open ended. Sorry, at your real job the boss isn’t going to come up to you in a panic and say “the network went down, which of these 4 answers is the reason?”
Troubleshooting, researching, and having curiosity are all important in this field. I’m having difficulty getting them to see that, or care.
They can’t do that, it’s illegal!
Dang this comment section is depressing.
Blah-haj.
Which I know is horrible and wrong but I can’t make myself stop.
“We value none of our workers, it’s nothing personal.”
The crystal generation!
Is this the new slang boomers are using now that “snowflake” gets you laughed out of the room? Doesn’t quite roll off the tongue the same. You should workshop it a little.
I didn’t notice until you pointed it out. Because why wouldn’t they be??
Can he please hire someone to teach him how to smile? He’s got the money for it.
Then why are you saying that the properties of art apply to things that are not art? Art is speech because it is used to communicate ideas. But you’re telling me that child pornography is not art.
What exactly is child pornography trying to communicate? How is it speech?
Alright could you define “art” for me because child pornography is not art by my definition.
Does that freedom of speech without protection of kids include child pornography?
I have zero idea why you think child pornography is linked to “freedom of speech,” as child pornography is not a form of speech. Could you please elaborate?
It gets really good after 10 hours thousand dollars.
I concede that is a good way to look at it and I did not originally interpret that as your intent. Apologies.