This brings up an interesting point. The snap would have to run a multi pass check to make sure that by killing half of all organic life, it’s not causing the other half to die off. Otherwise, it wouldn’t be confirming to the will of the user, but then does it “scan” individual life types independently or as an ecosystem unto themselves, in which case is there precedence? Do food producing things get a pass, because otherwise the snap is just shortcut the process for half of the population. If it does leave the food producing ones alone, then really he’s just snapping away apex predators.

Are you trying to spell literal? Not trying to be a dick, just unsure if you have a different word in mind.

But see, that is AI, just not machine learning. It’s classical AI.

From what I remember, it was meant to restate the obvious for effect. This feels like highlighting an underlying attitude instead.

Am I just old, or is this format wrong for the meaning of this meme?

I feel like android did that first, but I’m not sure.

At a basic level, all of your cards CAN effect the outcome for you alone. For example, if you have a king and a 5, and there’s a five in the river then you have a pair. This is ranked last in the hands you can have that still can win. If nobody else has anything, you win.if someone else’s hand outrank yours, they win. If you tie, then I believe (don’t quote me) that it comes down to who has the higher non-pair card. You’ll want to have a reference for the hand rankings if you’re playing casually, or memorize them if you’re playing seriously. Does that help?