Non native so maybe it just gets lost, but I don’t get it?
Is the error that the possessive ‘s is missing at ‘dogs’ ? If so, then its plural… I don’t get it ^^’
Non native so maybe it just gets lost, but I don’t get it?
Is the error that the possessive ‘s is missing at ‘dogs’ ? If so, then its plural… I don’t get it ^^’
I would be very worried if this was ‘final, and now we will do it as written’ but it seems to be just another iteration.the critique is great and I just hope they listen.
I am not shocked, but i’d save disappointed for when they try to do it and noone uses it because of these reasons.
Alter, der Artikel ließt sich wie als hätt den jemand geschrieben der 0 Verständnis von der Technik, Umsetzung und den Effekt der legislative hat; und noch dazu nur den packungstext gelesen hat, diesen nicht weiter hinterfragt hat und dann leider diesen Artikel schrieb.
Gut aber auch irgendwie beunruhigend. Das hört sich so an als hätten sie gemerkt dass es nicht durch geht und indem sie es vertagen ersparen sie sich ein definitives ‘nein’.
Mal sehen, aber ich glaube wir werden bald wieder was hören.
Cool! The arecibo message https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arecibo_message comes to mind with some of the designes!
So according to this I am a determinist turned absurdist? Neat!
As someone who sees these articles, who should I not vote for? Is there some ranking for ‘most asshole-ish politician’ regarding the EU? I know every politician has somewhat dirt on them but I’d love to know what to avoid since apparently some of those turds are worse than others.
In general the article seems to be a summary of current legislative actions that are ongoing between big tech and EU. Though in the article it’s worded with the much more fitting ‘game of chicken between EU and Big Tech’ rather than something like the title, but I guess “drop dead has a better ring to it”…
I general the article has a lightly optimistic tone, which I very deeply hope holds true.
Beg? Or am I misunderstanding this?
… Auf ein Mindestmaß von Intelligenz bei irgendeinem Menschen zu pledieren ist sehr riskant…
Which would also be worse than the events being unrelated. In the simplest case it’d be guilt-tripping ( you owe me!) or at worst some sort of odd blackmail.
[…]Plants vs. Zombies Jordan Adams, and Director Partnerships at EAX Matthew Angeleri.
Adams would also send female coworkers pornographic videos and even reference them in EA Slack conversations
While that seemed like an act of goodwill, Angeleri privately sexually harassed said female coworkers and even followed it up with videos of himself having lewd acts performed on himself.
Why the article can’t just state what the allegations are and at whom is just annoying, so here you go.
What confuses me a bit is the sentence just before the allegations to Angeleri:
As for Matthew Angeleri, he invited his female coworkers to stay at his home with his wife while visiting Vegas where they were given free room and lodging. While that seemed like an act of goodwill, Angeleri privately sexually harassed said female coworkers and even followed it up with videos of himself having lewd acts performed on himself.
Like… What? What is the logical connection between these two sentences? There could be months or years between those two events? How do these two relate? This reads as two completely separate events. So one could just be an act of goodwill and afterwards he decided to be a prick. Or, first the was a prick and then felt bad and offered the coworker a place to stay?
And if the two events were concurrent that makes it immensely more creepy.
Weißt du ob das auch wirklich die Partei selbst gemacht hat? Das schaut so aus als wäre das Plakat hoch oben also wahrscheinlich schon? Wenns die grünen selbst waren hab ich momentan auch nix im Sinne was das begründet…
I really think it’s disgusting to boldly claim this is just to protect children. Then get the proposal denied with very valid reasoning that everyone’s privacy would be compromised.
And then, a few months later, they have the exact same argument again with the same proposal as before… This seems deeply disrespectful of the subject matter
It feels like a someone is trying to steal a cookie from a cookie jar, but when mum said no you just try again the exact same way…
Super wie er das herzeigt.
Wnen man sowas hört wird man echt has
Das ist find ich echt witzig. Natürlich wäre es intelligenter gewesen die Betreiber zuerst zu fragen bevor man in einem dichten Gebiet sowas versteckt.
Aber lustig ist es dennoch. Massenpanik hätte aber schnell lustig zu tragisch werden lassen können…
Have you heard of e os? https://e.foundation/e-os/
De googling your android is at least a possibility, ripping apple out of ios is not possible
/u/Chainweasel@lemmy.world explains this well, though I got a different take on the analogy.
Imagine you are trying to put air into a deflating balloon that’s about to ‘loose form’ that’s essentially what you are trying.
Put just enough air (energy/mass) into the star and it will stay stable, loosing as much as you put into it.
Too little and the star will dissolved, in this example you’d fully absorb it.
Too much and you are essentially infusing a star with so much mass that it explodes all over again.
If you are trying to stabilise a star this way, ideally, it would never even begin to go nova.
Das kommt hier irgendwie nicht klar raus (ausser ich verlesen mich gerade), gibt’s nicht grunsätzlich mehr männliche autofahrer als weibliche? Ist dadurch nicht klarerweise die gesamte Statistik biased wenn man % ausrechnet vom Anteil Mann vs Frau, dabei ausser Acht lässt dass es pauschal mehr Männer am Steuer sind?
Kann mir nicht vorstellen dass genau 50/50 frauen/Männer lenken…
Edit: Hillock@feddit.de erklärt das besser
Oohhh OK, now I get it. I was missing that ‘bowl’ is short for bowling.