• Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy feels a lot more authentic to real life. If I started talking about tinfoil hat conspiracies, my friends would ridicule me to no end.

      As they should.

      Same here.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I start talking to random people in a bar odds are I won’t meet a single one who will start calling me a Nazi because I believe in the Uyghur genocide…

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Tankies tend to assume any accusation against a Marxist state is either a lie or the victims deserved it.

            One of the reasons is that you’ve got people like the Heritage Foundation running around including Nazis in their “victims of socialism” lists.

            Both as the victims and perpetrators btw, lmao.

            Mostly though they just seem weirdly stuck in a Cold War mentality.

            • Facebones@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Everybody loves jerking off about failed states but leave out how they always have to make it a vacuum while constantly under fire, conspiracy, and embargo by every capitalist state on the planet.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok, but how does that change the fact that Lemmy’s communists will call you a Nazi for pointing out the genocides perpetrated by those States?

                  • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It’s not whataboutism when the person is bringing the conversation back to the topic that another person whatabouted away from.

                • Facebones@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  On today’s episode of “Things everyone says lemmy leftists do but have never been able to provide examples of”

                  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Nah, it’s just that when provided with examples people like you either stop responding or try to find a justification for it.

      • Illegal_Prime@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, I’d expect pretty wild conspiracies like flat earth and chemtrails to be laughed at here, but a disturbing number of lemmings and even progressives in general follow a set of less outlandish - but more insidious - conspiracies that usually fall into the “collusion and malice” type. I could say that General Motors et al. killed most of the US passenger rail and streetcar systems, and most people here would accept that as a fact. Case closed, capitalism is evil and should be abolished, every bad thing is cause by someone with I’ll intentions making it worse.

        I, however, tend to be suspicious of those sorts of takes in general. Returning to the alleged “streetcar conspiracy”I’ve actually done quite a lot of research into this and can decidedly say that the primary cause of the decline of mass transit in the US was… There were at least 5 primary causes, none of which were shadowy groups deliberately working to destroy it. Rather it was killed by a changing urban environment, failures to adapt to modal shifts, legacy streetcar systems just generally sucking, and local governments taking transit for granted and assuming that they can hold streetcar companies to exacting standards while expecting them to remain solvent, all while not considering it their problem.

        I could go on, and can send some sources and references (maybe not direct links though) if you’d like to learn more. But my main point is that far too many people assume there’s a nefarious actor pulling the strings the whole time when it’s usually several factors lining up all the holes in the Swiss cheese and creating a negative externality we still talk about to this day.

        There (usually) isn’t a conspiracy, and if there is it’s unlikely to be anywhere near as all-encompassing as you think. People say there is because it gives them someone to blame, helps channel their anger at something tangible, and just makes a good story.

      • stinodes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        And there are no conservative ideas that aren’t tinfoil hat conspiracies, I guess

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are some - ideas that people should just eat shit and work as slaves.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, this place is full of communists. I’m not the biggest fan of communists, to be frank. There is a lot of backwards ideas that get accepted as “leftist,” when they’re really statist. Particularly revisionist history statist. If a communist party said it, you gotta defend it kinda thing.

      • Inevitable Waffles [Ohio]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t identify as a communist. I just don’t want life to be unreasonably difficult for people. Thats it. I just what the promise of what labor was supposed to be. I want it to free us from the shackles of work or die. Guess that is extreme left now even with tankies around the corner from us.

        • Carvex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. We have 50 years of computer driven exponential growth and not a fucking thing is better for us. We don’t work less, travel more, be richer, live a better life, or have a better future for the planet. It should make everyone anti-capitalist.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This. When I was younger I considered myself pretty centrist, generally people would agree. My views never really changed, but the Overton window has shot so far right I now get called a commie (I guess here I’m a tankie? Still dunno wtf that’s about except a slur for ‘left of Biden’) because I think a 40 hour work week should put a basic roof over your head, whether an efficency on your own or a roomie in a nicer spot.

          • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            (I guess here I’m a tankie? Still dunno wtf that’s about except a slur for ‘left of Biden’)

            As far as I can make out, tankies are people who support communist governments even when they go way too far. So even though leaders like Jinping are essentially dictators, because they’re ostensibly communist the tankies support them.

            At least that’s what I’ve seen from a few weeks on lemmy. I’m sure some tankies will be along to correct me soon.

            • Facebones@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah, so the thing I still haven’t seen happen except for everyone saying it happens to attack leftist instances.

              Oh, and people attacking others for worshipping someone all in when they point to any particular point of a particular person (IE “In regards to X, Lenin said Y” “Oh HeRe We gO aNoThEr LeNiN wOrShiPpInG tAnKiE”)

              Of course, I’m sure there’s SOMEBODY out here simping for China or whatever, but if that silly small percentage paints all leftists then by their own logic all capitalists should be branded as fascists - WAY more “right” people calling for fascism around here than China worshipperss and whatnot.

        • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not extreme left but it’s socialist and isn’t consistent with American ideals. You can bitch about that shit if you want but we’re in the decay phase after a gluttonous society and you think the answer is communism? You do, you think everyone and everything should be “fair” but life and this country don’t work like that.

          • Inevitable Waffles [Ohio]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Could be if we tried. The democrats have been neo-lib appeasement artists because they are a part of the ruling class. This system cannot hold. Something will change. We just have to wait and see which way it breaks. Either way, I’m already doing the work to see a world I want. I don’t care about the noise. Arguments like “Life ain’t fair” are a poor substitute for putting yourself out there. I used to think much the same way. But, I had to do something about how bad it is getting.

      • Rottcodd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a lot of backwards ideas that get accepted as “leftist,” when they’re really statist.

        This is my objection too.

        All too many people here don’t seem to even begin to understand the inherent threats of institutionalized authority, so in their rush to head off the recreation of the Third Reich, they’re basically advocating for the recreation of the Khmer Rouge instead.

        • IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure how I identify philosophically but I wholeheartedly beleive that I should have the iron fisted power to drive all the radical christofascist conservatives and their enablers bloody and screaming back into their hovels or over a very high rocky cliff.

          Other than that I am a pretty nice guy.

          • Rottcodd@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And I dream of a world in which, instead of merely wishing to oppress and murder this group of people instead of that one, people don’t wish to oppress and murder anyone.

          • coltorl@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can read more into Karl Popper’s Paradox of Tolerance if you want to harden your philosophical position for what you have described.

            • Rottcodd@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Most people seem to miss the fact that it’s a paradox, even though it’s right there in the name.

      • Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Define ‘full of communists’… cause it sounds like such an american phrase and perspective. To me, it’s just a more leftwing centered space. The real communists are a minority. At least on the biggest Lemmy servers.

          • Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah but those instances are not nearly as big as lemmyworld and the others. I also didn’t say that there were no communists at all. There are just not as many as OP made it out to be.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just checked and you’re instance isn’t federated with Hexbear so you don’t see their users’ comments, my instance was federated with them for a couple of days and it made the Lemmy experience a mess.

              • Anamana@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I have more than one account, none of them get many communist posts. Maybe there’s one in there in a few rare occasions but it’s not significant.

        • TheFriar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lol I’m not crying “SOCIALISM!” because someone recommended taking care of poor people. And maybe it’s just the communities on lemm.ee, maybe it’s because I interact with the communities more because I can’t bite my tongue. But I come across way more communist communities than anything else. Your instance matters. I see a lot of communist communities. As an anarchist, the prevalence of communism on lemmy is troubling to me because I see huge flaws in the thinking and i want to see the left not follow down a doomed hierarchical road that has proven to be a failure over and over and over again.

          • Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Hm might be. On lemmy, the instances you’re signed on significantly affect your experience.

            Lemmy world and feddit never gave me such vibes tho. But it might also be because you’re indirectly looking for these confrontations.

            • TheFriar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lemmy.world I think has banned most tankie subs. It wasn’t until the endless problems with lemmy.world that I switched over to lemm.ee and I see way more communist shit, but have way fewer connectivity issues.

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            i want to see the left not follow down a doomed hierarchical road that has proven to be a failure

            Instead you’d want everyone to adopt a system that literally can’t possibly work. Genius.

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What system do you think they are referring to as an anarchist? Anarchism is simply opposition to hierarchies that allow control over others, such as the control capitalists have over workers by owning the means of production and political forces. The system that anarchists advance in place of that can take an unlimited number of forms.

              • Gabu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Anarchism is simply opposition to hierarchies that allow control over others, such as the control capitalists have over workers

                Or the control the hierarchical entity (state) must have over a populous to stop thievery and violence. Even in a perfectly idealized world, anarchism only just barely gets to work, teetering on the brink of collapse.

                • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  We have a state now though, has thievery and violence been stopped? How many thousands are in poverty, how many are killed in global wars waged in the name of profits? There are states where theft and murder are extremely rare, and states where it is common. What is the difference between the conditions where it is common and uncommon? Is a top-down control and manipulation the only way to reduce violence?

                  Anarchism works all the time. It’s more than a political structure, it’s an idea about how to organize relations between people, and there already are many groups that are active that function on anarchist principles.

                  Any group that collects itself in the modern world as anarchist, like anarchist groups in the Spanish Civil War, are heavily repressed by state forces. Capitalist states work together to discourage anarchist ideals even more so than communism because of the possibility it has for threatening traditional power structures.

                  • Gabu@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    the possibility it has for threatening traditional power structures.

                    You mean the possibility of completely collapsing civilization as a whole.

                    We have a state now though, has thievery and violence been stopped?

                    Fallacious reasoning, and pretty obvious at that. I give you a cup of water - some water has been poisoned by heavy metals. If you drink the cup of water, will you get metal poisoning? The only intellectually honest answer is: the question is flawed. The same way it doesn’t follow that
                    Some water is poisoned ⇏ All water is poisoned
                    It also doesn’t follow that
                    The suppression of violence begets control ⇏ All control suppresses violence.

                    This is further proven by your following statement

                    What is the difference between the conditions where it is common and uncommon?

                    Which opposes your own argumentation.

    • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tell that to Voat, or Gab. There’s plenty of offshoot free speech platforms that got flooded with actual racists and Nazis the same way that Lemmy got flooded with actual communists and anarchists.

    • Carvex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A heel dragging regressive policy opinion should always be met as such. The world will never go back to the Wild West with gun laws, whites owning everything, women are property etc; to have a political viewpoint desiring these things and feel that it is correct is laughable.

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What free market? All I have ever known is corporate socialism. Subsidize business with taxpayer dollars. Regulatory capture to prevent competitors from entering the market.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          Somehow it’s not socialist when you prop up corporate entities with billion dollar handouts a few times a decade everytime they fuck up but a single mom getting $100 only usable for food because she was let go from her job of 5 years with 10 minutes notice is a communist plot single handedly destroying America.

          • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            Communist governments do the exact same thing, except if you talk about it they send you straight to the gulag.

            • Facebones@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Lmfao imagine simping so hard you believe nobody goes to jail in the name of capitalism in the land of the highest per capita incarceration rate in the world.

              Or gets taken out.

              Or has their government interfered with or overthrown.

              Nope capitalism is love and freedom 💖 UwU 💖

            • Gabu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Delete your account and leave society, you’re not welcome ANYWHERE.

        • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hence why our economy is going to shit.

          We need to eliminate the corruption and return to free market principles, not add even more buerocracy that only benefits the Oligarchs.

      • Inevitable Waffles [Ohio]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        You see all these people out here suffering and still say this? Where in the world can I get what you are taking because I’d love to be able to tune out everything that hard.

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not that capitalism doesn’t have flaws. It’s that all the other systems so far have had worse and bigger flaws. Regulated capitalism with welfare is the least bad system by a wide margin.

          • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            This guy gets it.

            The governments job should be to act as referee, ensuring fair and orderly markets. Nothing more, nothing less.

      • Izzy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the best at creating rampant consumerism and waste in the name of fake numbers going up at the cost of human happiness and fulfillment.

        • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope, that would be your government interfering in the free market by issuing inflationary fiat currency.

          Inflation drives a spend it or lose it mentality. Crony capitalists love that shit.

        • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you have a better system for the future, let’s hear it.

          And no, a reboot of communism doesn’t count. Fresh ideas please.

          • Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “If you have a better system let’s hear it”

            any suggestion other than the current system

            “No NO NOOOOO! IT’S NOT CRONY CAPITALISM! WAHHHH!”

              • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Just one example, Democratic Confederalism. There are endless possibilities, even within the scope of ‘communism’. To think free-market capitalism is the best that can be come up with is a severe underestimation of the powers of human ingenuity.

                • AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Finally someone willing to think outside the box! Thanks for posting, this looks like a good read.

                  • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That is one of my biggest gripes with political discourse of all varieties, lack of creativity. I admit don’t know enough about the ‘democratic confederalism’ to fully support it, but from what I’ve heard it is compelling, it just comes to mind when I think of the question of capitalism vs communism.

              • Gabu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Communism hasn’t ever even been implemented, except in small communes.

          • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d be interested to hear what you think communism is but I digress.

            My better system starts with providing universal healthcare, education and housing.

            That’s it. I want people to not go bankrupt for going to the hospital, not take out huge loans for university education and not have to pay exorbitant housing costs.

            If you think this is fairy land dreams you have no comprehension of how much money is currently being redirected from these very things into the hands of capitalists so they can have a bigger yacht.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What makes you say that? As a random example, leaded gasoline existed for 50 years longer than it should have. We’ve known lead was toxic since the Roman empire, and the only reason it was invented was to increase profits.

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much the whole world used leaded gasoline and capitalist countries were the first to phase it out. US phased it out relatively early compared to others, Japan was afaik the first to outright ban it in 86. My ex-eastern bloc country only fully banned it in 2002.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I recall a significant event that happened to the Eastern bloc not long after countries started banning leaded gas, could it be that the collapse of an entire political system prevented those countries from handling that?

            What does the usage have to do with it? It was invented strictly for profit, and as such, leaded gas was the only thing being manufactured. Cars had to be specifically tuned to use it.

        • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Romans died from lead in the aqueducts by the tens of thousands in Pompeii so saying they “knew” is misrepresentative to say the least. They didn’t know why. Do you really need hyperbole to make your point?

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Before modern germ theory, we thought nightshade killed us because it unbalanced our humors. The why isn’t important, it’s the understanding of toxicity.