• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think technically censorship is the editing of the content, not a system of consequences for the content. Traditionally censors operate in the publication pipeline, taking articles as input and providing new articles as output.

    There’s information suppression, which can include both censorship and silencing of voices, which is what I’d call what you’re referring to.

    • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Censorship usually is taken to mean the suppression of speech or writing. If you’re legally prohibited from saying or writing something, you’re being censored, by definition.

      Where are you getting your definition of censorship as meaning content being edited?

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        From the fact that “censors” were people stationed at newspapers in the 20th century, doing what I said.

        • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The term predates that usage by well over 2000 years. Roman censors would essentially punish people for immoral behaviour by taking away their rights or by reducing their status in some way - for example, punishing them for speaking out of turn or publishing offensive material.