• exi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      YouTube premium views pay creators a LOT more than ads. So if you care about supporting creators and the platform they run on, then premium is an easy choice.

      Additionally, most people spend a lot more time in YouTube than any other streaming site, so the cost makes sense given how fucking expensive video serving is.

      • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        On the other hand, YouTube is also supporting some content creators you hate…

        … But at least you don’t have to watch them.

        • mild_deviation@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          YouTube is a business with a clearly-defined business model, precisely-tracked direct metrics, and automation up the wazoo. Not a government taking taxes and dealing with human elements for which there are very few direct metrics. They can pay creators based on watch hours or some other usage metric.

          • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What I mean is that paying for YouTube premium is a very indirect and inefficient way to support your preferred content creator.

            • exi@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              But my preferred content creator could not exist without YouTube and YouTube shoulders the enormous expense of hosting videos. I don’t get why they should not get compensated for that as well.