• joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    114
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m all for being comfortable in your own skin. I get it. Life’s hard enough. But there’s a reason why your sex or gender at birth is important. How your body works genetically and how you feel are two different things. The conditions which led to your genetics may be a larger environmental issue and need to be accounted for.

      • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        65
        ·
        9 months ago

        Trash opinion?

        Do you think that knowing a person’s gender at birth is not important? Come on man.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s unimportant for literally everyone but them until puberty

          And from that point on its their and their doctors problem

          • Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It isn’t like the data will be displayed to the world. The dude is just talking about science having data points.

            It is a person seeing that the child was born XY, write that down, and… not even the name is needed. The point of data, a (+1), let’s science know there is now +1XY.

            The data doesn’t affect the person in any way.

          • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            32
            ·
            9 months ago

            That data still has meaning.

            How you feel about your gender, and your gender at birth are two very different data points.

              • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                27
                ·
                9 months ago

                Don’t give a shit what’s in your pants. I just care if we have a data point that depends on people being born as X and they have condition Y. If you change your gender, you change X and that may fuck with the data.

                So pulling an example out of my ass: if you are born male, have a condition for say colon cancer. You change your gender to be female. Your doctor does a colonoscopy and finds the cancer after the gender swap (sorry if not the best term). You’re now a female with colon cancer, but what if it was actually due to some genetic conditions from the male side? Changing it to female fucks with the data.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  33
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So the one percent of people who are trans are going to fuck up medical statistics? That’s your pathetic excuse for these comments? The most generous one can possibly be with you here is to say that’s a huge stretch. It’s certainly a weird thing to focus on.

                  • Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    You’re being rude. All the guy is saying is that it might affect data.

                    Does that make them a transphobe to say that male genetics has a higher chance for colon cancer and having it be tracked as a woman would dilute/fog up the data?

                    Science and data are objective. This guy just cares about numbers, not your sex and gender. Just the numbers of it.

                  • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    19
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I’m saying they should be accurately recorded so they can be accounted for. If you can’t see how this is a big deal, I can’t help you.

                    I honestly don’t care what you identify as. Be a fucking apache attack helicopter. I don’t give a shit. I want people to be able data from specific birthd and have them be able to accurately correlate the data. I don’t want the data to be fucked up because someone decided that they are a different gender.

                • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  24
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Do you think that they don’t have your whole medical history? Like if they’re looking for a Y-chromosome associated cancer they’ll just pull up my surgical and prescription history and see “oh yeah that’s related” or they’ll order a karyotyping to ensure they’re correct because XY-AFAB people and XX-AMAB people aren’t *that^ rare of an intersex condition, especially as chimerism is downright common.

                  However what’s much more common is hormonally associated phenomena that aren’t extremely well known to be such. The most famous example is that after not very long on hormones trans people’s heart attack symptoms change to our hormonal sex’s. For a long time it was so rarely known amongst emergency room professionals that trans people were more likely to die of a heart attack.

                  But beyond this, that’s medical professionals and it’s a complicated discussion that’s currently happening in both the medical and trans communities by those who are affected most by it and those who are experts on these topics. What was clearly meant by this post was not that, but rather that people should feel 100% certain as to what is between the legs of every acquaintance and stranger they meet and that the government needs to know what each and every individual’s birth sex is.

                • PapaStevesy@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So adjust the data. That’s what science is. It’s always changing as we learn more about ourselves and our universe. Look, I’m really sorry that statistical conclusions drawn from inaccurate data aren’t helpful, but that’s true whether trans people exist or not.

                  • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Adjust the data? How?

                    You lose that data point. You can’t just magically fix it. That’s the whole point.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do I think it’s important for a medical doctor? Sure. Do I think it’s important for you to know? No. Why would it be?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m just curious, has any strangers’ genitalia impacted you in any way that actually matters? And no sports don’t count no one gives a shit about the .1% of athletes who are trans and how much of an AdVaNtAgE they have.

      From where I’m sitting, people just need to shut the hell up about other people’s lives. They impact you in no way. Yet you impact their lives, taking their rights away and driving them to suicide. These types of comments literally contribute to suicide. Your comment could be the last straw for someone reading it, and they could choose to end their life because of you. And you sleep at night fine I’m sure. You should care about what that says about you.

      Other people have hard lives and you don’t need to make them harder. Deal with your own shit. Let others do their best to deal with theirs.

      • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        9 months ago

        People do give a shit about sports, because that’s what’s always in the news.

        I don’t care what you do privately. If you want to engage in some competition though, there’s rules and regulations and it’s important that everyone is on an even playing field. That’s the whole point about the different divisions.

        My comment about having different divisions because you genetically decided to modify yourself may cause someone to end their life? I don’t think so champ.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          No one truly cares about how a handful of trans athletes MaKe ThE gAmE uNfAiR. They like excuses to be cruel. You for example. Perfect evidence of that is that I point out the suicide rate and that the constant hate trans people are exposed to often causes them to commit suicide. You could not possibly give less of a fuck that you could be contributing to that. No self reflection whatsoever, even when a mirror is forced into your face. Brushed it away like it was absolutely not worth considering for a moment. You’re trash. You’re a liar. You’re grabbing onto a bullshit justification to spread hate.

        • eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I fight people and have opinions! Main thing right now being HEMA, mostly blunted axe + shield sparring. It’s mixed-gender and my experience is that men and women are pretty competitive with each other. I’ve also fenced competitively, which has male and female divisions but men and women practice against each other all the time. Across both sports, height is far, far more important than sex. Like if you’re 5’10", you inherently have an advantage in reaching your 5’6" opponent, whether they’re male or female. People focus on sex like it’s sufficient to equalize genetic advantages and “level the playing field” but think of the difference between the shortest man you know and the tallest man you know. Would you honestly say they’re on an even playing field in every sport because of their sex classification?

          It really depends a lot on the sport, hormones and time do a lot more than you’d think, and male/female divisions aren’t a level playing field to begin with in many sports. Also sure, there is a reasonable discussion to have at a professional level, but in most sports at anything less than the most elite level it’s such a non issue. Anyone pushing to police it in kids’ sports via genital inspection has lost their minds.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This comment feels like it’s from 2017 or something. If you’ve spent any amount of time on social media in the last few years, you know damn well how this comment would be responded to.

      If trans athletes are causing a serious, quantifiable disruption in competitive sports, to the point you can direct me to multiple bodies of evidence that clearly show a trend of cis athletes being overshadowed, then, and only then will I agree there is a problem.

      But there isn’t.

      There was no reason to impose restrictions on trans athletes before there is any data to suggest they were a problem. They only reason is prejudice.

      And the same goes for trans people in gendered bathrooms or any of the other shit people come up with as hypothetical problems for pearl clutching. You can imagine all kinds of ways gender could have “environmental” impacts. “Could” is the key word. We’re not going to operate on “could”. I want “is”.

      Show me the trends. Show me the data. Show me where it’s a quantifiable problem first, then we’ll talk.

      • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        You need to protect the idea that people competing in a specific league don’t have any advantages.

        Imagine if LeBron changed his gender and began competing in the WNBA. Do you think he’d magically suck, or would he dominate? This doesn’t magically change the 38 years of training that he has done as a male. It’s not a hard concept. When thinking about these things, you need to think about these edge cases because that is what is going to get abused.

        • Nikki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          strawman argument 101: what if EXTREME EXAMPLE happened? this should dictate how we treat all levels of competition because (???)

          you act as if being trans is a choice made at a whim, and can be easily made to take advantage of a situation. obviously if some major athlete came out there would be more than just “oh she competes in the womens league now”, but we dont have to talk about that because that is such a worthless strawman argument

          how will this affect lebrons legacy

          • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            You need to consider edge cases when making the rules. You can’t just ignore them and hope that people don’t abuse them.

            I’m not acting like being trans is a choice. I want competitions to be in as level of a playing field as possible. Competing in sports is a choice though.

            • Nikki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The edge case is called that for a reason, dictating every level of competition based on edge cases is how you push a narritive

              Let olympic athletes and organizers sort out how they want to handle the .01% of athletes that are trans, basically every other level of competition it doesnt fuckin matter. The only reason its brought up 99% of the time is to push a transphobic narritive and i am so fucking sick of it

              • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                Ok, you have no idea what you’re talking about. Not everything is transphobic.

                You can’t just make rules that are like “this is allowed unless Nikki@lemmy.world thinks it provides an unfair advantage”.

                You don’t make rules and just hope and pray people don’t find edge cases and abuse it.

                • Nikki@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  the issue is bringing bigoted government legislation into what should be exclusively top level competition. you and i both know that ted cruz (example) isnt gonna be playing touchy when it comes to taking away our rights

                  if its just the top level people deciding what an advantage is, in just high level sport, then fair. but letting that seep down to collage, high school, and below is a path to genetal inspections on teens and children

    • Lophostemon@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not that simple. Brains and exterior bodies are not necessarily coordinated like that, and bodies themselves take a myriad of forms.

      Don’t be fooled by those saying “there are only Men and Women and That’s That.” It’s not true.

      • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t care the actual values. In fact, I want people to be happy so whatever you need to do to achieve that go ahead and do it.

        I apologize if the following sentences aren’t exactly PC, don’t mean any harm by them.

        I care about the values for other reasons. Say someone was born male, undergoes HRT and becomes female. Due to their birth genetics, they are more likely to get X disease. They have no health issues, undergo HRT or whatever, and then the disease is found. So now they are a female with X disease.

        That data is very different. That’s all I care about.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t think keeping lists of trans people is particularly good social awareness for stupidly obvious reasons: There’s a lot of people who would see such a list as a list of targets.

          Realistically, most medical staff will be aware of commonalities. For instance in your example the specialist that treats "X’ disease will notice fairly quickly if a majority of their patients are trans especially since maybe up to 2% of the population is trans.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      How the fuck does that make it any business of anyone other than your motherfucking doctor, and even then, significantly less often than you’ve convinced yourself of? (seriously - if your GP keeps asking you about your genitals every time you go in to see them, you should report them and find a new one, E: never mind them even knowing your chromosomic or genetic or even hormonal make up)

      You’re just a wilfully ignorant transphobe trying to pretend they aren’t one.

      But you are.

      And if that bothers you - you can just stop being one! I guarantee its easier than being a miserable hateful little bigot, no need for all that mental gymnastics, for starters…

      Otherwise - fuck off back up your own ass…

      • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t care about your gender at birth. Really don’t. I do think that your gender at birth has significance. If you were born a male with certain genetic factors, and you change your gender to female later in life, it is very important to know that you were born male with factors X Y Z and not female. It’s not a tough concept.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If you were born a male with certain genetic factors, and you change your gender to female later in life, it is very important to know that you were born male with factors X Y Z and not female. It’s not a tough concept.

          No, it isn’t a tough concept, you’re just a bigot. ¯\(ツ)

          I noticed that I edited my reply just as you posted this, so I’ll add this here because you made the exact leap I knew you would - does your doctor know your chromosomes? DNA? Have you ever even had your hormones tested? The answer is almost certainly “no”, because most people don’t, because those things are hardly ever relevant, and if they are, it isn’t because someone is trans (E: in most cases, anyway).

          No matter how many ridiculous leaps you make, and how many times you swear you don’t care about gender at birth or whatever:
          You
          Are
          A
          Transphobe

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            No one gets tested for it because it’s very rare for it to not match up with your assigned sex at birth. Why spend hundreds of dollars on a test when you can just ask someone and get things right over 90% of the time? In recent years, doctors have always asked for both gender identity and assigned sex at birth, presumably because both are medically relevant.

            But the OP is clearly not about medical data for healthcare purposes.

          • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not a transphobe lol. I don’t give a shit about it. I want you to be happy as a person, and you do you.

            I don’t want incorrect conclusions being drawn from a shitty dataset due to people changing their gender at birth. You were born with a certain sex. You can’t change that, no matter how hard you try. That information is also valuable, there may be trends that affect a specific sex more. If you change your gender, you could pollute that dataset and lead to incorrect conclusions drawn.

            Not everyone hates transpeople. Just because someone has a different opinion than you doesn’t mean they hate transpeople. Take a second to get off your high horse and actually think about the concepts I have commented about.

          • Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            If a person born with XY chromosomes is more likely to get a disease, goes through the healing process of transformation, and then gets the disease… it would be nice to know for statiatics that it was an XY-born person. A beautiful woman, but born XY. If she gets the disease, it is false to say the disease affected an XX-person.

            This is not transphobic.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              it is false to say the disease affected an XX-person.

              Give one example of anything like this ever happening.

          • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Incapable of learning what? Why are you so incapable of thinking of ideas that go against what you believe?

          • Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            I would guess because people such as yourself insult and don’t teach. I’m grouchy tonight.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              “I went into a trans friendly post with my transphobic talking points and people were rude to me! I am very upset about this and there is no way I could have seen this coming or prevented it!”

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re totally right. But the meme is probably referencing the fact that Republicans seem to care a lot about sex and gender when it comes to kids sports, or sports in general. That comes off worse considering Republican states are banning transgender treatment, or allowing conversion therapy. Seems like they really don’t like the LGBT community and try to hide it behind “health” related or “sports equality” related reasons.

      • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        44
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ok? Great? The post is missing the fact that whatever genitals you’re born with at birth is actually an important fact.

        As you grow up, if you feel you are X instead of Y, great Good for you. That doesn’t change the environmental conditions that led to your birth.

        Also with sports, the issue is with the league “names”. Create an “open” division where anyone can compete. Then create a division that’s biological females only. You think there’s no genetic advantage to someone who was a male for 30 years and then changed their gender (sorry if this isn’t worded the best). The issue here is creating a fair playing field for everyone.

        • kase@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          create a division that’s biological females only.

          As a trans man, I see this as an absolute win. /s

          I’m just making a pedantic joke btw. I’m assuming you’re talking about cis women.

          • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s clear that Joe is just a transphobe hiding behind “Oooo technically important oooo” ignoring the fact that the fascists want to check children’s genitals not for any of those “important” reasons

            • Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              Wanting to ensure the fidelity of data is not transphobic. You can be trans, that’s fine. For data purposes, what were you born as? Male? Thanks. You’re a woman now? Ok cool.

              What is transphobic here?

              • Nikki@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                wanting to probe my genitals while not being my doctor is transphobic, that is the only person who would EVER have to see my genitals. anything more is a sign of a serious issue, words cannot describe the discomfort that would cause me, and im a grown adult.

            • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              31
              ·
              9 months ago

              Get the fuck out of here.

              I don’t care what you choose to identify as. But your gender at birth is an important data point.

              • Harvey656@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You keep saying that but never giving a fucking logical reason. Reading your schizophrenic replies is getting old.

                Explain, why it’s fucking important. Saying its important doesn’t make it so.

                • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  It’s not? So there’s no medical conditions which affect men more than women?

                  Interesting, interesting.

          • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            If they were talking about that set it would be useful to specify that set. But of course that would mean using icky terms like “cis” instead of denying the humanity and even biological existence of trans people. Can’t be having that, now.

          • violetraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            The women’s sports that they care so highly about at this time for some reason. Next they’ll probably talk about some hypothetical niece that plays sports and “whatever will she do” in sports with the trans

          • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            33
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yes?

            If there’s no genetic advantage for men, why did Chess have separate divisions?

            • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              You must be a troll account because a human capable of literacy asking that question honestly is beyond comprehension.

              • Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                Rude. Are you proud of your insult? How does that help the conversation? If a human doesn’t understand something, it is because they were never taught. You had an opportunity to educate someone about something you know. You had a chance to spread knowledge. You chose to insult them.

            • Perfide@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              If there’s no genetic advantage for men, why did Chess have separate divisions?

              The ACTUAL answer is misogyny. Chess was(and still is tbh) a very misogynistic “sport” back in the day, and many male professional chess players refused to play against women, and the ones that did play against them were often crude. To try and get more women interested in chess, women only divisions were created. It has literally nothing to do with genetic advantages.

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              9 months ago

              I can’t speak for chess, but in gaming where there’s similarly no sex advantage, female gamers are rarely seen at the higher levels because the environment is very hostile towards them. Creating a separate women’s league would alleviate this to some degree and encourage more women to actually try to reach for the top.

              • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                9 months ago

                So in esports there are also distinct female divisions. I haven’t seen a female team play a male team in Dota2, CS, LoL, any fighting games, etc.

                • Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Top teams won’t even consider a woman. I recall years ago applying for top guilds in World of Warcraft. I logged onto TeamSpeak for the interview, said hello, and was immediately rejected because “women are too emotional to work with”.

                  A woman might be the best player in the world, but the sport doesn’t respect women and will deny her a platform .

              • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                9 months ago

                So the comment chain reference sports having different divisions for men and women.

                These generally depend on a physical difference between men and woman.

                Why would a sport which removed all physicality, still have separate divisions?

                  • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    15
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    If there’s no difference in sports or shit with men and women, shouldn’t we just have one division?

                    If a sport that doesn’t depend on physicality still has separate divisions ( literally chess) what does that mean to you?

        • Rambomst@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You are missing the fact that this issue is so unimportant and that even talking about it when everything else is on fire is… well… kind of moronic tbh.

          • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            So I get there’s important social issues around gender. But at the same time people are so caught up in how they feel that they miss out on the important fact that your gender at birth means more than what you want your gender to be. There may be environmental issues which are dependent on your gender at birth.

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              9 months ago

              There may be environmental issues which are dependent on your gender at birth.

              Can you elaborate on what you mean by this and why it’s important? I don’t understand how your gender at birth affects the environment in any way that matters.

              • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                9 months ago

                So there may be specific issues that are related to genetics. I don’t really work in that field, but let’s say that in a certain area, males more likely to have X disease and it shows after 30. So like colon cancer or something.

                If they go and change their gender to female, how does it affect those stats? Are they suddenly less likely to experience those issues?

                I honestly don’t give a shit about how you identify. I want you to be comfortable.

                • howrar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I still don’t see how that’s relevant to the environment. I’m guessing you just misspoke there.

                  Good science will consider your assigned sex at birth for these stats where relevant. No one is disputing the value of having that information and no one has problems with it because this data is all anonymized. The problem that the OP is referring to is when this data is collected without anonymization and used to bring harm to specific people based on their medical records. There’s no reason for anyone besides your doctor to have access to your medical records. Scientific studies require explicit consent to get that data.

            • SomeSphinx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              “means more” isn’t a factual statement, it’s a value judgement and some people value being the best version of themselves more than they value leading a miserable existence because of their genetics. Environmental issues are also just that: results of the environment rather than innate expression of X or Y chromosomes. The point the OP post is making is that instead of focusing on economic policies, global warming, and wars, politicians are more focused on who decides they’d be happier as a man/woman/non binary person. It’s a complete waste of time for everyone BUT doctors and researchers since we shouldn’t be judging or limiting what people can do based on what genitals they were born with, and instead be focusing on how to fix massive, glaring, and disastrous issues such as the ones described in the post.

    • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      But there’s a reason why your sex or gender at birth is important. How your body works genetically and how you feel are two different things. The conditions which led to your genetics may be a larger environmental issue and need to be accounted for.

      Incredible how often when a transphobe is asked to explain these ‘important reasons’ it literally relates to games. I’m taking about grown adults, so deeply concerned about games with balls that checking whether children who play have balls is now a fixation.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      You need to get out of your small town you’ve never left and meet some people who are more educated who can help you.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      But there’s a reason why your sex or gender at birth is important.

      Sure, ok.

      The point of this meme is: is it really more important than all of those issues listed? Is having a slightly skewed dataset (which will not happen because people that ACTUALLY need to, know that) more important than healthcare itself being a complete disaster?

      • joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not sure how preventing someone from changing the sex they were born with is at all related to healthcare being a complete disaster, but alright.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They’re not related. The point of the meme is that, even among those extremely important issues that permeate the entire society, the thing republicans choose to focus their efforts on is this boogeyman fight against trans people.

          Why is that the most important thing on their minds when a ridiculous amount of people are in crippling debt just because of health reasons and the whole planet is slowly turning into a frying pan?