I’ve just been reading about how in the future, AI will allow us to speak with animals, and people will be able to communicate telepathically and live in their own VR worlds. (etc., etc.)

Man, this isn’t a world I want to live in. I’m so tired of the constant paradigm shifting that you have to put your brain through with each innovation. I wish technology just stayed frozen in the 1980s – there would be so much less uncertainty in my life and I could just focus on being a human.

Innovation keeps being forced on you and I just feel tired. >!And I’m only just in my 20s!< Is this ok? Is this valid? When resisting it is a loser’s game…

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It could be a sign that you’re too surrounded by the stuff. I used to always be tech & specs obsessed. It was like I viewed the world through the lens of technology because that was going to make new things possible.

    But then in recent years, my relationship with tech has changed and I am better for it. It’s less core to my personal existence even though it is just as handy as ever and my life is full of screens.

    It starts to sound like cliches and platitudes, but most of what makes the world beautiful and life worthwhile has not changed. Seriously just spending a lot of time outside and with the people that matter to me produce undeniable results, even if I have to drug myself to kickstart the process. But after doing that a few times, being mindful and intentional about the whole process being for positive outcomes, I start not just looking forward to those occasions but prioritizing time & money to help.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is exactly how the 90s felt when the dotcom bubble was building and moores law was in high effect.

    Every 6 months your computer components were obsolete

    256MB hardrives! Holy shit sooo much space!

    Whaaaaaat 1GB drives?!? Daaaaamn

    Whoa whoa whoa CdRom? Blink I can write to cds? Whats this + - business?! Sneeze, holy shit you can rewrite a cdnow?!

  • bamfic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Isnt this the premise of the matrix? Tech plateaued in 1999 and went downhill from there

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    When I was young, I really valued the idea of technological progress. It was almost axiomatically the goal of humanity. Getting greater abilities to do more things more easily… it seemed like the ultimate goal.

    But now that I’m older, I’ve seen what happens with technological power like that, and it isn’t great. Yes, we can do more things more easily than before. And what is the result? The main result seems to be increase consolation of wealth and power, and increasing the rate at which the world’s resources are depleted.

    • People can now connect instantly and effortlessly with anyone anywhere in the world - and the result is that enormous numbers of people shun their local peers and instead have shallow parasocial relationships with strangers who’s job it is to advertise products to them.
    • Clothes are cheap and easy to create - and the result is mountains of waste created by fast-fashion low-quality throw-away clothes largely made from slave labour. Similarly for many products, in particular plastic products are now choking the world in waste.
    • Cars are more efficient, and production quality is high - and the result is massively oversized monsters, completely negating the efficiency benefit and instead increasing the amount of space and maintenance required to handle the increased size and weight of the machines. The streets are basically filled with cars and spaces for cars, with less and less space for people to do people things.
    • Half-decent AI has finally been created. It’s a long-held dream come true… except that the outcome isn’t quite what we hoped. There’s a lot to say on this topic, but just to keep it snappy, I’ll oversimplify it by saying that people are not using it to do better. They are instead outsourcing their own thoughts and imagination.

    Our silky-smooth hyper-connected ultra-convenient world is not leading people to be happier, or smarter, or kinder. And it certainly isn’t helping humanity survive longer. We’re burning out fast.

    A lot of what we have superficially looks like ‘progress’, but in full description it looks more like a dystopia. Things are easier, but perhaps the good things were already easy enough; and so the main effect is that exploitation and manipulation got easier. Even when we agree that we’re going in the wrong direction, the messages are still muddied enough that we accelerate rather than change course.

    Anyway… I don’t agree with my younger self. I no longer think that technological advances are intrinsically good. I think taking things a bit more slowly might have been more wise. I’ve thought about it a lot, and I think a core part of it is that money corrupts. Unfortunately, money is very tightly intertwined with most of what we do - so that’s a pretty difficult problem to fix. So I won’t go into more detail about that now!

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      people are not using it to do better. They are instead outsourcing their own thoughts and imagination

      Exactly, technology is eating society instead of society being contientious about its use of tech. I believe that the pendulum will eventually swing back and people will start to ration their use of technology, but until that happens, opting out will remain really hard and I don’t know how to work with that…

      And yes, I agree that much of the ‘progress’ has been solutions to problems people didn’t know they had. (But this is only tangentialy related to my problem.)

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The main result seems to be increase consolation of wealth and power, and increasing the rate at which the world’s resources are depleted.

      Welcome to capitalism.

  • mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yes. Much of the technological improvement I’ve seen in the last 20 years isn’t real meaningful. Smartphones don’t make my life better. A 60” flat screen 4k TV doesn’t make movies any better. My 2019 Jeep gets worse gas mileage than my 1978 Gremlin. Plane rides are worse. Ads cover everything I look at. We no longer own music we like to listen to

    Was any of it good? Sure, but most of it is just garbage to generate more consumption

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yeah. Great engineering is, if you can do more with less. What was the last time you have seen that in software?

    • mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      30 years ago, I had to spend 40 hours a week working. Decades later with all the software improvements, I have to work 40 hours a week

  • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    At some point, there was this shift where the technology was no longer being designed to benefit the user, but to benefit the creator. The problem is that the creators are now trillion-dollar multi-national organizations who also lobby against my wellbeing and safety in areas of rulemaking and regulation. So now I am fine foregoing the “technology” whenever I can.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I think the thing that’s causing me the fatigue though is the constant change. For 000s of years people lived their whole lives with no technological change, whereas I’ve only been here for 2 decades and yet the world already works much differently than it did back then.

  • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It would probably seem less daunting if we knew that these great technological innovations couldn’t be controlled and hoarded by a small group, but were instead widely available for the public to use on equal ground. And further, if we would all equally share in the efficiency benefits, rather than just a small group.

    Like, if my boss told me half my job was being automated by ai, but I’d still get the same salary and only have to work 2.5 days per week, I certainly wouldn’t complain.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Those kinds of thoughts started creeping in during my mid 20s as well. Before that age everything is new and better because you don’t yet have the experience to know if something is just new but not better.

  • Azzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It feels to me like you don’t hate progress, but you hate late stage capitalism.

    If progress happened without it being forced on you, without you “having” to adapt to not “fall behind”, when all your needs were provided for without having to compete to satisfy them…

    Would you really mind progress that much?

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    What your experiencing is a kind of social decay due to people being squeeze more and more, and not just economically.

    This isn’t specific to tech though, if there was no tech, they would just find other ways to make life harder.

    This is just the journey we’ve been on since the Industrial Revolution where the market decides what our new environment is for the sake of profit.

    The good news is that it’s a journey of ups and downs, so it could stop being dystopian soon.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This is just the journey we’ve been on since the Industrial Revolution where the market decides what our new environment is for the sake of profit.

      Well said

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      so it could stop being dystopian soon.

      Narrator voice: it wont

      Such course reversal requires drastic policy changes at the highest level and there is zero indication that any of this is happening.

      Watch in 4 years google won’t get broken up

      Realpage is still price gouging renters after settlement

      Dynamic grocery store prices based on your income.

      Why have product of different quality when you can sell the same shit ar scale and adjust based on income?

      I am being semi serious here too… Like from the owner perspective, why wouldnt they do this?

      Who is going to stop them? Daddy sam?! Bitch please

  • Classy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I think a problem here is that technological advancement and technological progress are not necessarily the same thing. I don’t think that every new piece of technology that pushes us further into some kind of strange new world necessarily is good for humanity, or society, or even just the individual. I think this is some of what you’re noting in your post here. Sure, on the whole the internet has probably been a net positive for Humanity, but one can’t deny that at the same time there are a lot of strikingly negative aspects of the internet, and that it’s further and seemingly endless encroachment on our lives is deleterious.

    I think that as I’ve gotten older I’ve become a bit more technology averse, or at the least a bit more suspicious of technology, than I used to be as a child, and maybe part of that is becoming a father, but at the very least I can respect where you’re coming from and I agree with you. It seems like our world is just a never-ending carousel of novelty and we’re never allowed to just absorb and respect the things that we have before something new comes in and shifts the paradigm.